Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
11-07-2012, 08:31
|
#76
|
|
CLM Number
Charter Lifetime Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Seattle, South of Canada
Posts: 10,500
|
The not-so secret was that a majority of LE in Washington actually supported I-502 (Marijuana legalization) because it brought the industry under tighter controls, while hopefully gaining additional revenue for the state and establishing some base line for impairment when operating a vehicle.
In fact, much of those who opposed 53 were "co-op" growers who feared that their ability to deal would be curtailed by tighter controls. In reality, pre-53 was looser and somewhat more Libertarian in orientation, even if possession was more controlled for non green card holders.
So while legalized, it also is more tightly controlled by the state. It blows Libertarian minds.
__________________
Neo-pagan, FORMER Libertarian, Cop, Gun Owner, Jewish Heritage - I'm the small talk at parties!
Certified Glock Armorer
Certified M&P Armorer
Winter is coming.
Last edited by Morris; 11-07-2012 at 11:32..
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 09:58
|
#77
|
|
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey...sucks
Posts: 29,482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanBDawg
To bad that in CA the courts already ruled since MJ is legal (with a prescription) your 2nd Amendment right aren't at all affected.
|
Which carries the same weight with the feds as the states legalizing marijuana...NONE. If you are a marijuana smoker, you ARE a "prohibited person" under 18 USC § 922(g) and it is no more legal for you to possess a gun than a convicted felon, illegal alien, person committed to a mentaol institution or person convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. Same law. State courts have no say in it. At best, they can exempt you from some of CA's state gun laws, but you could just move and not have to deal with state regulation of gun purchases anyhow.
I support the legalization of all drugs, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with people who don't understand either the law or the practical effect of the changes in it.
__________________
I deserve to lose a gunfight if I ever take gunfighting advice from James Yeager.
Last edited by Bren; 11-07-2012 at 14:07..
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
11-07-2012, 10:23
|
#78
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,402
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
Which carries the same weight with the feds as the states legalizing marijuana...NONE. If you are a marijuana smoker, you ARE a "prohibited person" under 18 USC § 922(g) and it is no more legal for you to possess a gun than a convicted felon, illegal alien, person committed to a mentaol institution or person convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. Same law. State courts have no say in it. At best, they can exempt you from some of CA's state gun alws, but you could just move and not have to deal withg state regulation of gun purchases anyhow.
I support the legalization of all drugs, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with people who don't understand either the law or the practical effect of the changes in it.
|
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...declines-cert/
SCOTUS declines.
OR must issue CCW to MMJ patients as per COURT ruling.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:01
|
#79
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The OC
Posts: 1,674
|
What are all the medical MJ dispensers gonna do now that their government protected monopoly no longer exists?
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
"Necessity is the argument of every impingement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants and the creed of slaves." - William Pitt
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:07
|
#80
|
|
CLM Number
Charter Lifetime Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Seattle, South of Canada
Posts: 10,500
|
Good question. It was fairly fluid to begin with and many operated without proper business permits, floating in a gray area of business versus co-op private clubs.
Many of the dispensers were split over Washington's laws. The more business oriented ones (that had business licenses, kept real books, etc.) were supporting while the ones that were literally "fly by night" were opposed.
Of course, the federals have already indicated that they will press on, regardless of a state law. Which, of course, flies in the ointment of the current federal occupiers as they don't want to offend two states that voted Democrat.
Will be interesting to see the case laws that develop from this.
__________________
Neo-pagan, FORMER Libertarian, Cop, Gun Owner, Jewish Heritage - I'm the small talk at parties!
Certified Glock Armorer
Certified M&P Armorer
Winter is coming.
Last edited by Morris; 11-07-2012 at 11:07..
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:08
|
#81
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,743
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubble-Tapper
wow. this is huge. discuss.
|
Why is it huge? Personally I don't care what they do.
Just so long as I have the right to fire someone for coming to work under the influence of it, and if you drive under the influence of it you can go to jail.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keoking
If you're gonna be stupid, don't pull up short. Saddle up and ride it all the way in.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:27
|
#82
|
|
CLM Number 250
Cheese?
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 5,779
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saber99
HA You are aware that 98% of marijuana arrest(about 750,000/yr) occur at the local and state levels right. When states stop enforcing the law the DEA who have what 6,000 agents at most, doesn't stand a chance at meaningful enforcement. Even just targeting the larger players the DEA will still be quickly overwhelmed by shear volume of users and demand. Good luck cleaning house, they are going to be struggling just to keep their heads above water just between CO and Washington. What happens when more states follow the trend?
Personally I hope these two states voting to legalize, will force the issue at the federal level.
|
This - while it remains a Federal crime, there are truly profound limits on what the Feds can do in terms of enforcement.
There must be a half-dozen medical MJ stores within two miles of my house, all technically illegal under federal law, and subject to ATF action, but they're operating every day with a big green cross out front on a lit sign.
The VAST majority of MJ prosecutions are at the local and state levels, and it's awfully tough for the ATF/FBI, etc. to work when they're getting zero support from local LEO's.
Washington State's decision isn't the final word, and the Feds are clearly on the other side of the table from the state at this point, but for 99% of tokers, the effect will be that MJ is legal.
FWIW, I hate the stuff - my parents were both cigarette and MJ smoking hippies, and as a small child I learned to hate the smell of smoked anything, from incense to pot. Still do, in my early forties.
__________________
Your behavior angers God and/or the Constitution. Just sayin'.
I've been married for 7 wonderful years. Of the 18 total.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:31
|
#83
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles, Man, Los Angeles
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOH212
It's still illegal on the Federal level as it should be.
What the states want to do or pretend to pass into law hold no weight on the Federal level when it comes to this topic.
Until they get it changed on the Federal level, they're breaking the law.
I can't wait for the DEA to clean house!

|
Ha ha ha. You are just a short sighted nanny state apologist. Wait til the Feds come for your guns and you try to assert States rights.
__________________
G21~G26~G30~G34
Sic semper evello mortem Tyrannis!
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:39
|
#84
|
|
Amsterdam Haze
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,056
|
Try and get a job that requires a urine sample.
DOT drivers license? Forget it.
It will create more food stamp recipients 'cause potheads can't get work.
__________________
GTDS
I'm not as think as you drunk I am.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 11:47
|
#85
|
|
Amsterdam Haze
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,056
|
I'll be waiting on the news about a future showdown between the feds and the state police protecting it's citizens.
__________________
GTDS
I'm not as think as you drunk I am.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 12:40
|
#86
|
|
the wrong hands
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocjackel
What are all the medical MJ dispensers gonna do now that their government protected monopoly no longer exists?
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
|
Ummm, sell to everyone instead of just those that have a card? It will be more like Wal-Mart than Costco. Plus up to 6 plants are legal so many more people will be growing their own.
This is happening people. No way around it just like gay marriage. I would personally like to thank the religious right for making this possible.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 12:42
|
#87
|
|
the wrong hands
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo
Try and get a job that requires a urine sample.
DOT drivers license? Forget it.
It will create more food stamp recipients 'cause potheads can't get work.
|
I found a way around that. Started my own business. **** working for people that think they have control of me in my free time. It will be so ironic if this is the thing that finally turns our economy around in a few years.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 12:50
|
#88
|
|
woo woo
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 26,937
|
I don't recall the Prohibition being a flaming success, nor the War on Drugs....or Gun Control.
Legalize the stuff, tax it, and create industry.....there's tons of folks already set up for business.
__________________
"You need a shotgun, man, it's got a good spread.
It's easy to load, doesn't have a lot of working parts...ya ain't gotta be that accurate, the further away you are the more **** you hit."
-B. Burr
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 13:04
|
#89
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The OC
Posts: 1,674
|
I was being sarcastic. I find it funny that the medical MJ dispensers used basically the same arguments that the supporters of these propositions used, when they wanted medical pot legalized. This will greatly reduce their profit margins.
They claimed that medical MJ use was not the governments business but then want the government to protect their profit margins by prohibiting competition.
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
"Necessity is the argument of every impingement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants and the creed of slaves." - William Pitt
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 13:13
|
#90
|
|
Semper Paratus
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,521
|
legalized Marijuana brought to you by.........................
ummm nevermind I forgot...
__________________
How do you establish intent?
Well when a naked man is chasing a woman down an alley with a butcher knife and a hard on, I figure he's not collecting for the red cross...Inspector H. Callahan
Last edited by Mayhem like Me; 11-07-2012 at 13:13..
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 13:27
|
#91
|
|
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 40,882
|
We need more stoned/drunk useless people dragging on the system.
Sent from the toe of my jack boot using Tapatalk 2
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".
"A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read."
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”
Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 13:29
|
#92
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 710
|
__________________
A person is smart. People are dumb
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 13:34
|
#93
|
|
Silver Membership
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: the School of HardKnoxville
Posts: 10,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo
...
It will create more food stamp recipients 'cause potheads can't get work.
|
BAH ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
   
You funny.
I'll mention that to the surgeons, dentists, lawyers and cops I know who smoke... As well as damn near every restaurant employee I've ever met... And, well, heck, at least the last three Presidents of the United States of America... and so on, and so on, and so on...
__________________
Go To http://mfdas.weebly.com Now!
Originally Posted by bjman
Mark my words...there will be NO Assault weapons ban introduced under Obama.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 14:09
|
#94
|
|
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey...sucks
Posts: 29,482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by holesinpaper
|
Yes, by a state supreme court court ruling. All the U.S. Supreme Court said is they aren't taking the case. Everything I said above applies.
__________________
I deserve to lose a gunfight if I ever take gunfighting advice from James Yeager.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 14:11
|
#95
|
|
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey...sucks
Posts: 29,482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO
We need more stoned/drunk useless people dragging on the system.
Sent from the toe of my jack boot using Tapatalk 2
|
I want all drugs legalized. Protecting people from themselves is the source of our problems now. I want less protection and the type of people who are apparently the majority in this country will sort themselves out within a couple of years.
Our best chance of getting back on track is more freedom and less safety - make me free and let the people who need government-provided safety kill themselves/each other.
__________________
I deserve to lose a gunfight if I ever take gunfighting advice from James Yeager.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 14:38
|
#96
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,507
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOH212
It's still illegal on the Federal level as it should be.
What the states want to do or pretend to pass into law hold no weight on the Federal level when it comes to this topic.
Until they get it changed on the Federal level, they're breaking the law.
I can't wait for the DEA to clean house!

|
I bet you consider yourself some sore of patriot, don't you?
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 14:46
|
#97
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The OC
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO
We need more stoned/drunk useless people dragging on the system.
Sent from the toe of my jack boot using Tapatalk 2
|
What a joke. The last 40 years of pot prohibition has been a huge drag on the system. It's basically been a jobs program for cops, DEA agents, prison guards, lawyers, and bail bondsmen.
It's truly depressing to think how much money has been spent "fighting" this silliness over the last few decades, not to mention what it's done to personal property rights.
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
"Necessity is the argument of every impingement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants and the creed of slaves." - William Pitt
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 15:02
|
#98
|
|
Platinum Membership
Fear no evil.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 21,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
I want all drugs legalized. Protecting people from themselves is the source of our problems now. I want less protection and the type of people who are apparently the majority in this country will sort themselves out within a couple of years.
Our best chance of getting back on track is more freedom and less safety - make me free and let the people who need government-provided safety kill themselves/each other.
|
__________________
Dear diary,
Today I was an opinionated ******* on teh internets. It was cool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey dirtbag -- really great gig you got there -- ever do anything productive in your life??
-dksck
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 15:22
|
#99
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO
We need more stoned/drunk useless people dragging on the system.
|
Clearly the answer is more stringent and more comprehensive prohibition.
The War on Drugs to date has been nothing but an appetizer!
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 15:25
|
#100
|
|
CLM Number
Enforcerator.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Retired, but not expired.
Posts: 12,553
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubble-Tapper
wow. this is huge. discuss.
|
It's not as huge as you think to people who don't smoke dope.
__________________
Obama's administration did what? President Obama’s going to be angry when he learns about this on the news tonight.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:16.
|
|
|