GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2012, 12:47   #21
ModGlock17
Senior Member
 
ModGlock17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lalaland USA
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickE10mm View Post
I seen this and other tests. The 165 grain GD is designed for high-speed, whereas the 180gr GD is not the designed for speeds above 1200 or so feet per second. Ymmv of course.
Agree.

I think penetration relies on simple momentum mass*velocity and the cross-section of projectile, but not so simple when it sheds part of its mass along the way. Given the same bullet design, the 165gr would have the same momentum as the 180gr@1,200 if it goes at 1,309fps.

If more than 1,309fps then the 165ge would have more "mo" and likely to penetrate deeper, if other variables held constant.

Then we get into the age-old discussion of whether it's momentum MV or it's energy 0.5*M*V*V ....

At a minimum, we should have proof here, that penetration is not simply a function of the bullet mass.

A more informative experiment would be using two bullet weights but same JFP, 165gr and 180gr. Design and Verify their speeds to have the same momentum, say 1,309fps and 1,200fps respectively. See what penetration tells us, about the momentum model or the energy model fits better.

Remember, the 135gr@1,600 would have the same Mo as the 180@1,200 , as far as the momentum model is concerned. So if the Mo model holds for penetration, these two would have the same penetration ???

Last edited by ModGlock17; 12-03-2012 at 15:52..
ModGlock17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 18:05   #22
Andrew Wiggin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 626
There are other factors involved. Speer may use a different lead alloy for the two bullets. Although both my gelatin and tnoutdoors9's Simtest are BB calibrated (he doesn't post BB velocities, though) my gelatin is not actually 250A bloom photographer's gelatin and his Simtest is not even gelatin. The fact that they are different substances but nearly the same density may contribute to the discrepancy. Or it could just be a statistical anomaly. Only one bullet was tested by each of us.
Andrew Wiggin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 19:11   #23
G29SFWTF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 206
Andrew, thanks for those gel tests. It would be interesting to see if the 180gr deforms the same way it did for TNOD9 on multiple shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ModGlock17 View Post
I would be interested in the result of 180 XTP or 200gr against vehicle doors. We've got wax (21Carrier) and gel (AndrewW) results but real life stuffs would be good (wild hogs and junk yard stuff). LOL
No car doors but drsjr1969's channel has some vids of shooting various rounds at what appears to be mild steel.

http://www.youtube.com/user/drsjr1969
G29SFWTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 06:29   #24
ModGlock17
Senior Member
 
ModGlock17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lalaland USA
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Wiggin View Post
There are other factors involved. .
That's why you'd use the same bullet make up, except for weight, to narrow down factors.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
ModGlock17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:01   #25
Andrew Wiggin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 626
Problem is, we don't know if Speer uses the same alloy for the 180 gr bullet as they do for their 165 gr bullet. I doubt if they'd be willing to say because that's going to be kind of a trade secret.

I'll definitely have to re test that load. Once I get through some more of these tests, I'll go back and retest the ones that were most interesting.
Andrew Wiggin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:23   #26
ModGlock17
Senior Member
 
ModGlock17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lalaland USA
Posts: 2,641
Sounds like you've got to make the assumption that they are the same, for now. Possibly cross check with the two weight classes from another mfgr, like Hornady. This can be a team work thing. Those of us have Hornady in possession, should be able to mail you like 5 bullets each type. That way you'd have a variety. I can send what I've got. Decide what you need, then post it. Folks can participate this way.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
ModGlock17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 14:32   #27
Andrew Wiggin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 626
I've got 165 and 180 gr Gold Dots but I have no idea how to tell if the alloys used are the same.
Andrew Wiggin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 14:56   #28
orangeride
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 472
I know there's a way that they test lead for hardness. It might be pretty simple.
orangeride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 15:12   #29
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeride View Post
I know there's a way that they test lead for hardness. It might be pretty simple.
Lee makes an inexpensive"kit" for hardness testing but it doesn't even need to be that complicated. The alloy itself has it's own characteristices. You aren't designing a Mars lander.

As far as testing factory bullets, fire them into media and recover them. Bullets are funny things. All the scratching on paper and crunching numbers often falls flat in predicting performance.

Last edited by countrygun; 12-04-2012 at 15:15..
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 14:54   #30
Chainlink
Senior Member
 
Chainlink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maine1 View Post
The XTP's get my Vote. I like the 200's for post SHTF versitility. Also come up with a cast lead load for utulity/small game to allow for 1) cheap practice now 2) non- critical use post SHTF

SERIOUSLY consider a 40 conversion barrel to take advantage of the more plentiful 40 brass, while retaining the 10mm advantages.

XTP's...stock em deep. Have 2-3 loaded rounds on hand.

Multiple g-20s would be ideal.
I agree with maine1 , I myself would like to try casting my own. As far as bullet choice I really like the xtp 180 grainers.

posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
Chainlink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 13:22   #31
dm1906
Retired SO
 
dm1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PRK (Kalifornia)
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Wiggin View Post
I've got 165 and 180 gr Gold Dots but I have no idea how to tell if the alloys used are the same.
You don't need rocket science to find out all of the above. The lead core will be essentially irrelevant, as they are swaged, and almost always at or near pure lead. The jacket provides the structural hardness, and bonding, if applicable, is either by soldering (heating), adhesive, or both. The difference between "hard" or "soft" pure lead is so far below what is considered "hard" (such as hard cast), it just doesn't matter to a degree we (consumers) can measure. Hardened lead (alloyed) is not ideal for swaging, and would lead to inconsistent finished bullets, even in a laboratory type process. Most bullet mfg's (such as Hornady) claim to use pure lead for the core. Of course, there are exceptions, but these would be classified in an "exotic" category, and apply mostly to non-lead, non-toxic bullets (some Winchester non-lead have a pure tin core).

To determine the core (lead) weight, peel the jacket from the core and weigh it. Or, you can melt the lead out of the jacket and weigh the pour.

To examine the jacket, hold a bullet with long pliers, and use a propane torch to melt out the lead. Keep the temperature at just enough to melt the lead, without damaging (burning/melting) the jacket. Once the jacket is empty, it can be weighed, and mic'd for thickness. Measure the base, as it'll be the most likely common section of differing bullet weights (they may use the same cup/blank for different bullet weights). If you want to test the jacket for hardness, do it before heating, or molesting in any other way.
__________________
Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke
dm1906 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 511
110 Members
401 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31