GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2003, 16:55   #1
C150J
Crackberry
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 451
PFDs vs. Traditional "T" for New Students??

Hey guys,

With the advent of affordable PFDs (like the new Garmin GNS 1000) and their presence in GA aircraft (the FAA's new "Technically Advanced Aircraft" term), do you think students should be learning on them, or on "steam"? Personally, I think new pilots should be trained on a traditional "T" panel initially, as it seems to me that most PFD/MFDs are designed for more experienced pilots. To me, they SEEM to be more of a "snapshot" of what's going on, not a "full briefing." For example, an airspeed "tape" is a lot different than a fully-arced gauge, as it really expects the pilot to have a general idea of what ref speeds are. What do y'all think? What about learning on FADEC versus a three-levered (throttle, mixture, prop) quadrant?



Justin
C150J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2003, 17:49   #2
flybywire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Memphis
Posts: 603
You gotta learn the fundamentals. Start at the bottom and work your way up. The stuff at the top doesn't always work. (Almost always works though.)
flybywire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2003, 18:25   #3
BillCola
Supreme Cmdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Utopia
Posts: 3,136


I agree with both of you, BUT...in 20 years or less, they'll all be PFD's anyway, don't ya think? Then, it will be moot.

On the other hand, learning on a PFD now would leave a person with a whole lot of unfamiliar aircraft left to learn.
BillCola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 09:27   #4
Medpilot 2
Smkumifyagotum
 
Medpilot 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,451
Send a message via AIM to Medpilot 2 Send a message via Yahoo to Medpilot 2
Are you talking about the G1000?

The Flight Deck

I think it depends on what type of equipment is going to be flown later on. Why learn the antiquated stuff if it's never going to be put to practical use?
Medpilot 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2003, 01:46   #5
rwg_bt
Senior Member
 
rwg_bt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 492
Heh, even the backup horizon is glass.
rwg_bt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2003, 08:50   #6
glocknsail
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: non-Maine
Posts: 1,005
After flying glass, you will have no scan.
glocknsail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2003, 08:52   #7
Superfueler
Glockenplane
 
Superfueler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 837
Send a message via Yahoo to Superfueler
I'm not sure how you define affordable, but I know I won't be buying one anytime soon, and neither will the flying club I am in. While we will see alot more glass in GA planes in the near future, there will still be plenty of 'normal' cockpits out there. I think the basic training should focus on the T config, and then if a student transitions to a glass cockpit aircraft, train them to use that setup.
__________________
Aviation Forum #1903
Superfueler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,207
363 Members
844 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42