08:40 PM - Page 614

ChuteTheMall · 05-06-2012, 08:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall

MOVED to Page 614

_The_Shadow · 05-06-2012, 10:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall

˙sıpɹɐʇ ǝɥʇ uı ɹǝʇıɔɐdɐɔ xnןɟ ǝɥʇ ʇno pǝʇɹoɥs ʎpoqǝɯos

I didn't xnןɟ with it!

VN350X10 · 05-06-2012, 13:34

Not possible.....

While Mongo is competent to co-pilot TARDIS, he has not yet solo'd & the onboard over-ride controls won't let him do anything to hurt himself, TARDIS or us !

I'm planning a BBQ so I know he's going to turn up in a day or so.
Hope he's not hiding thinking that I'm going to punish him for a small mistake...
uncle would never do that. Use it as a learning experience, yes, but punish, never.

Even if I wanted to, HerMajesty Geesie I would have my hide, and NOT in a good way !

ChuteTheMall · 05-06-2012, 14:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

Hope he's not hiding thinking that I'm going to punish him for a small mistake...
uncle would never do that. Use it as a learning experience, yes, but punish, never.

You can tell each time that he learned something because another toe is missing.

samurairabbi · 05-06-2012, 14:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

Uh, Rabbi,....has anyone SEEN Mongo since this started ?

I can't seem to locate him anywhee that he normally hides...

Mongo is currently "operating on detached duty status". If you want to ask what THAT is, then here is my reply: Don't ask!

VN350X10 · 05-06-2012, 18:57

No, it's just that since this weekend was the opening of "The Avengers", someone might mistake him for the Hulk or worse & try to get his autograph.....
I don't wany him traumatized. It'll take weeks to get him out of his shell if that happpens !
I'm actually fond of him & don't want any harm to come to him.

Perhaps HerMajesty could help ?
Could you contact her Rabbi ? In the mean time, I'll resume my search for Mongo.

uncle

samurairabbi · 05-06-2012, 20:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

Perhaps HerMajesty could help ?
Could you contact her Rabbi ? In the mean time, I'll resume my search for Mongo.

uncle

I shall raise the subject with HerMajesty at the next audience she deigns to grant me.

As far as your continuing search for Mongo: Mongo will be found when Mongo WISHES to be found.

VN350X10 · 05-06-2012, 22:03

Wishes to be found, or is persuaded to reveal his location....

"Ve haf our vays uf doing dese tingz"....

samurairabbi · 05-06-2012, 22:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

Wishes to be found, or is persuaded to reveal his location....

"Ve haf our vays uf doing dese tingz"....

Hmmmmm ... Wouldn't it be necessary to FIRST find Mongo in order to interrogate him about why you can't find him? I think this contradiction would be obvious even to a myopic 10-Ringer! (Pardon my redundancy)

_The_Shadow · 05-07-2012, 09:05

There was that matter of the "tracking chip" which also had GPS loacator via the 4G cellular systems...however, this gets sketchy in the outer galatic relm.

If Mongo has gone off with Her Majesty Geesie to another shoe b***ar, they are not likely to be located, due to jamming protocals...

VN350X10 · 05-07-2012, 09:09

VN350X10 · 05-07-2012, 09:10

No, no shoe bizzare this time....
Mongo is hiding, HerMajesty is ensconced in her private apartment & TARDIS is right outside uncle's window at this time. And no, it's not a holographic image, I personally fixed the blender.(at this time, I refuse to say exactly what Mongo had it hooked to)
Suffice to say, it wasn't a N.S.F. compiant hook-up !

countrygun · 05-07-2012, 11:31

Well on the positive side, at least we know that we don't know which is far better than not knowing that we don't know because if we don't know, that we don't know, we might make "assumptions" (which are the mother of all %^&*ups) Considering the vast amount of things that we know we don't know, that, in itself, constitutes a vast amount of knowledge and we should be quite proud of ourselves for how much we actually know that we don't know.

Taterhead · 05-07-2012, 13:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

Well on the positive side, at least we know that we don't know which is far better than not knowing that we don't know because if we don't know, that we don't know, we might make "assumptions" (which are the mother of all %^&*ups) Considering the vast amount of things that we know we don't know, that, in itself, constitutes a vast amount of knowledge and we should be quite proud of ourselves for how much we actually know that we don't know.

Precisely! Perfectly articulated.

ChuteTheMall · 05-07-2012, 13:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

Well on the positive side, at least we know that we don't know which is far better than not knowing that we don't know because if we don't know, that we don't know, we might make "assumptions" (which are the mother of all %^&*ups) Considering the vast amount of things that we know we don't know, that, in itself, constitutes a vast amount of knowledge and we should be quite proud of ourselves for how much we actually know that we don't know.

I knew it.

_The_Shadow · 05-07-2012, 13:37

They said knowledge is power, "The Shadow Knows" what they thought they knew, which really wasn't known to be known! If I knew better, I'd say we are talking in circles, around the round table!

Pass a Brew to me and to you so we can do, what we do, that we may do, that vodoo, we do so well!

VN350X10 · 05-07-2012, 13:48

I don't know about that......

countrygun · 05-07-2012, 14:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

I don't know about that......

But, at least, you know that you don't know, If you didn't know that you didn't know about that, it would mean that either you didn't consider whether or not you knew about that, or that you lacked to ability to conclude whether you knew about that, ergo the fact that you know that you don't know shows a proper amount of "mens rea" to validate a conclusion should you find yourself in a position of knowing about that. This is a preferential position to occupy, vis-a-vis conclusive ablities, than one occupied by someone who didn't know that they didn't know about that. Of cousre given the covert nature of that and the rammification and potential implications of that perhaps it would be most efficacious to simply for the pro tem, say that "the less said about that the better"

samurairabbi · 05-07-2012, 19:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

But, at least, you know that you don't know, If you didn't know that you didn't know about that, it would mean that either you didn't consider whether or not you knew about that, or that you lacked to ability to conclude whether you knew about that, ergo the fact that you know that you don't know shows a proper amount of "mens rea" to validate a conclusion should you find yourself in a position of knowing about that.

Okay ... ... ... but what if you don't CARE!

VN350X10 · 05-07-2012, 20:01

Caring depends upon the relative value one places on knowledge.........or not.

samurairabbi · 05-07-2012, 20:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by VN350X10

Caring depends upon the relative value one places on knowledge.........or not.

If you don't know whether or not you care ... then would it matter whether or not you care about whether or not you know ...

(This is getting heavy, even by Dungeon doubletalk ... Whoops! ... by Dungeon scholarly analyis standards. I think I will alleviate my increased mental aggravation level by sneaking into the Post-Weekend Lagoon Recovery Blowout. My cellphone will be covered by Dungeon admin and embezzlement staffers, in case anything really hot breaks while I am otherwise engaged.)