Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
08-13-2004, 22:27
|
#1
|
|
Hey Buddy!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 125
|
Question about camera lens??
Is it better to have one lens that can cover 28-300mm, or one lens for 28-105mm and a second for 70-300mm? There are other combinations possible as well, so is one lens that encompasses a wider range better than a couple lenses that cover less?
__________________
Glock 23 in Threat Solutions UCR
Fight crime...Shoot back!
Chance favors the prepared mind
Action cures fear
"Gun Control means using BOTH hands." ~Jacobson
|
|
|
08-13-2004, 22:40
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oakland CA/Reno NV
Posts: 897
|
Camera lenses are like a lot of other things - a tradeoff. A fixed lens, in any size, will give you a better picture than any adjustable. I have two lenses, a 28mm and a 105mm. I have always gotten excellent pictures (provided I do my part). If you have never done it take a 105, or so, mm to a party and shoot candid shots. I have gotten some exceptional pictures that way. People look natural.
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
08-14-2004, 14:24
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dunwoody, near Atlanta, Georgia USA
Posts: 949
|
In general, the 28 to 105 or such will be smaller and faster than a zoom lens going from 28 to 300 or such. Maintaining quality in a lens with a very wide range is hard to do without costing a lot.
That being said, I have decided on a 28 to 200 for the working lens for my 35mm Nikon SLR while travelling if weight and size is a factor. Otherwise I would carry two or three bodies a half dozen lenses or more, as well as a tripod, if I wanted to ensure good results from a photo shoot.
In the digital world, the cameras with 10 or 12 times optical zoom are not the best for highest quality results. Their sensors are smaller and the megapixels are limited to 3.2, 4 or 5. Camera shake starts to come into play at the high end of the telephoto zooms and the image stabilizers are a separate topic in themselves.
__________________
DISARMING GOOD PEOPLE GETS THEM MURDERED.
Remember the heros of United flight 93 including Georgine Corrigan. "Lets roll"
|
|
|
08-14-2004, 21:05
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 159
|
"Better" is hard to say. If weight is a serious concern, then one lens is prolly better. But generally speaking the wider the range of the lens, the lower the quality of the images it will produce. Of course there are always exceptions, but they tend to cost $$$.
-Aaron
__________________
Work hard. Play hard. Always kick butt.
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 19:23
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 6,985
|
There was a time when a zoom was a compromise. I really don't think that's the case now. There was a day when I carried a 20, 24, 35, 50, 85, 105, 180 and 300 daily. Now most days I work with a 17-35 on one body and an 80-200 on another. and a fanny pack. I have a 50/1.4 mm in the bag just in case I have to have that middle ground. New zooms arew sharp as a tack.
Todd
__________________
ergo bibamus
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32.
|
|
|