GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2004, 22:27   #1
pilot718
Hey Buddy!
 
pilot718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 125
Question about camera lens??

Is it better to have one lens that can cover 28-300mm, or one lens for 28-105mm and a second for 70-300mm? There are other combinations possible as well, so is one lens that encompasses a wider range better than a couple lenses that cover less?
__________________
Glock 23 in Threat Solutions UCR
Fight crime...Shoot back!
Chance favors the prepared mind
Action cures fear
"Gun Control means using BOTH hands." ~Jacobson
pilot718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 22:40   #2
Colonel Klink
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oakland CA/Reno NV
Posts: 897
Camera lenses are like a lot of other things - a tradeoff. A fixed lens, in any size, will give you a better picture than any adjustable. I have two lenses, a 28mm and a 105mm. I have always gotten excellent pictures (provided I do my part). If you have never done it take a 105, or so, mm to a party and shoot candid shots. I have gotten some exceptional pictures that way. People look natural.
Colonel Klink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2004, 14:24   #3
General Sherman
Senior Member
 
General Sherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dunwoody, near Atlanta, Georgia USA
Posts: 949
In general, the 28 to 105 or such will be smaller and faster than a zoom lens going from 28 to 300 or such. Maintaining quality in a lens with a very wide range is hard to do without costing a lot.
That being said, I have decided on a 28 to 200 for the working lens for my 35mm Nikon SLR while travelling if weight and size is a factor. Otherwise I would carry two or three bodies a half dozen lenses or more, as well as a tripod, if I wanted to ensure good results from a photo shoot.
In the digital world, the cameras with 10 or 12 times optical zoom are not the best for highest quality results. Their sensors are smaller and the megapixels are limited to 3.2, 4 or 5. Camera shake starts to come into play at the high end of the telephoto zooms and the image stabilizers are a separate topic in themselves.
__________________
DISARMING GOOD PEOPLE GETS THEM MURDERED.

Remember the heros of United flight 93 including Georgine Corrigan. "Lets roll"
General Sherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2004, 21:05   #4
SJCA35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 159
Send a message via AIM to SJCA35
"Better" is hard to say. If weight is a serious concern, then one lens is prolly better. But generally speaking the wider the range of the lens, the lower the quality of the images it will produce. Of course there are always exceptions, but they tend to cost $$$.

-Aaron
__________________
Work hard. Play hard. Always kick butt.
SJCA35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2004, 19:23   #5
T. Harless
Senior Member
 
T. Harless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 6,985
There was a time when a zoom was a compromise. I really don't think that's the case now. There was a day when I carried a 20, 24, 35, 50, 85, 105, 180 and 300 daily. Now most days I work with a 17-35 on one body and an 80-200 on another. and a fanny pack. I have a 50/1.4 mm in the bag just in case I have to have that middle ground. New zooms arew sharp as a tack.

Todd
__________________
ergo bibamus
T. Harless is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,031
554 Members
477 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36