GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2006, 17:32   #251
Alaskapopo
NRA ENDOWMENT
 
Alaskapopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 16,457


Handgun service rounds are not likelyt o shatter the pelvis rather it be a 45 or a 9mm. It takes rifle or shotgun rounds to do that reliably.
Pat
__________________
Colt M16/AR15/ 1911 & Glock Armorer.
Certified Firearms Instructor & Urban Rifle Instructor.
Completed SWAT Entry Team and SWAT Sniper courses.
NRA Endowment Member
USPSA B class
Alaskapopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 17:40   #252
MOHAA Player
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Alaskapopo
Handgun service rounds are not likelyt o shatter the pelvis rather it be a 45 or a 9mm. It takes rifle or shotgun rounds to do that reliably.
Pat
I agree pretty dam hard for a single handgun bullet to SHATTER a pelvis.That kind of damage comes mostly from high falls or large impacts from a car or maybe a baseball bat but not from a single handgun caliber(12 gauge 00buck yes,45acp no)
MOHAA
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 17:49   #253
gary newport
Senior Member
 
gary newport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: People's Republic of California
Posts: 12,273
Quote:
Originally posted by MOHAA Player
I agree pretty dam hard for a single handgun bullet to SHATTER a pelvis.That kind of damage comes mostly from high falls or large impacts from a car or maybe a baseball bat but not from a single handgun caliber(12 gauge 00buck yes,45acp no)
MOHAA
Interestingly, Mas Ayoob described a pelvic shooting in his American Handgunner column a few months back. A lady NYC cop shot a knife-wielding BG once in the pelvis with a Gold Dot 124 +p 9mm round, taking him down -- and out of the fight.

The question before the court is: should the pelvis of an attacker be considered a desirable target for defense with a handgun? If so, when?
__________________
A forum with WalterGa is a more informative, funnier, and more interesting place.

G17, G17RTF2, G19, G21, G21SF (2), G26, G30, G30SF, G34 (2), G37 (2), G38, G39
gary newport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 17:54   #254
Alaskapopo
NRA ENDOWMENT
 
Alaskapopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 16,457


I believe the pelvis should be a target only if the head can not be hit. This is following com shots not working. I doubt that a pelvis shot will shatter the pelvis. But you could strike very important arteries in the region. Also most criminals do not wear body armor in this area.
Pat
__________________
Colt M16/AR15/ 1911 & Glock Armorer.
Certified Firearms Instructor & Urban Rifle Instructor.
Completed SWAT Entry Team and SWAT Sniper courses.
NRA Endowment Member
USPSA B class
Alaskapopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 10:14   #255
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
But the pelvic area is more prfused with blood the only problem with the pelvis is with a small caliber like 9MM the person you shot is most likely consiouse and awake and able to return fire. Mid body hits will be more likely to affect the upper spine, even with the energy transfer brusing the tissue. I prefer the larger Calibers .45 ACP. And I subscribe to the old theory of pull the trigger till they stop kicking
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 20:13   #256
bnlchris18
Senior Member
 
bnlchris18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 190
With a .45ACP, it doesn't literally shatter a pelvis per say, yet the impact is supposed to render the assaulters legs from functioning, and I am not refering to just one shot, that may not do the job even with a hot .45 round, but two shots at the pelvis should drop the target. Many of the instructers at the range are ex millitary, and I know of at least one who was a marine who served in Fallujuah. He told me that a lot of them swithced to 1911's in CQ raids and if they shot an insurgent, who are extremely dedicated for destruction, in the pelvis area once or twice they collapsed every time, faster and more profecient than center of mass shots. However I do agree that anything smaller than a .45 wouldn't work.
bnlchris18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 20:15   #257
bnlchris18
Senior Member
 
bnlchris18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 190
Also, as the recoil rises, adjacent rounds would travel upward in the navel area, I think it would be easier for a round to hit the spine going through the intestinal tract than the upper chest and ribcage.
bnlchris18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2006, 20:50   #258
MOHAA Player
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 16:14   #259
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
Pelvis or abdomin when you want them absolutly positivly to die .... eventually, and if they should survive they will wish they had not
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 09:31   #260
Aaronb2245
Member
 
Aaronb2245's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to Aaronb2245 Send a message via Yahoo to Aaronb2245
Quote:
Originally posted by vafish
And just where do you get that information from?

It's been a few years since I worked with them, but they did not qualify everyday. IIRC they had quartely qualifications (with the counter assualt team having monthly qualifications with 4 guns, handgun, AR, MP5, and shotgun). Like any federal police agency they had some gun guys that shot a lot but most were not gun guys and only fired at qualification time.

The presidential protective division and counter assualt guys did practice a lot more than most. But they still did not practice daily. They just didn't have a range available to do so, or enough time in the day to drive to the range, qualify, then work a full shift.
I wasn't going to say anything, but +1 that. Even in a Marine Scout Sniper Plt. we didn't shoot daily...we trained alot, but Qualing daily...really come on. The logistics and time requirements of doing that....they wouldn't get anything else done hardly if at all.
Aaronb2245 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 05:11   #261
PBR Sailor
Senior Member
 
PBR Sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CONUS
Posts: 725
Quote:
Originally posted by gary newport
Interestingly, Mas Ayoob described a pelvic shooting in his American Handgunner column a few months back. A lady NYC cop shot a knife-wielding BG once in the pelvis with a Gold Dot 124 +p 9mm round, taking him down -- and out of the fight.

The question before the court is: should the pelvis of an attacker be considered a desirable target for defense with a handgun? If so, when?
The question should not be decided by the court. Any application of deadly force to any part of the body should be determined by the defender when legally justified to use deadly force. The first priority should be rapid incapacitation, with the second priority being what part of the target is exposed and easier to hit when putting rounds on the problem. You don't always get to choose what is available for a target area.

__________________
Guerre 'A Mort

Last edited by PBR Sailor; 12-22-2006 at 05:18..
PBR Sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 14:18   #262
gary newport
Senior Member
 
gary newport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: People's Republic of California
Posts: 12,273
Quote:
Originally posted by PBR Sailor
The question should not be decided by the court. Any application of deadly force to any part of the body should be determined by the defender when legally justified to use deadly force. The first priority should be rapid incapacitation, with the second priority being what part of the target is exposed and easier to hit when putting rounds on the problem. You don't always get to choose what is available for a target area.

I used "court" as a metaphor; the question "before the court" was directed to participants in this thread and had NOTHING to do with law courts!
__________________
A forum with WalterGa is a more informative, funnier, and more interesting place.

G17, G17RTF2, G19, G21, G21SF (2), G26, G30, G30SF, G34 (2), G37 (2), G38, G39
gary newport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 15:26   #263
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
Bullet to the crotch works for me that will incapacitate pretty much any one. But what force can the perp then use? While the pelvis will put them down it will not put them out. Had this suspect been armed with any thing more lethal than a knife then the oficer was putting herself in danger since she still has to make an approch and restrain the suspect.
If she was justified in useing deadly force then she should have gone all the way, unless the Crotch/Pelvis was the only target avalible.
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 10:07   #264
10mm4ever
10mm Pusher
 
10mm4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: sw,Ohio
Posts: 4,374
My natural reaction would be to aim for the most stationary parts of the body, and aim low. The head can move independant of the body and taking the time to go for an atypical movielike headshot, may give the aggressor all the time he needs to kill you(remember, he's throwing bullets as well)?? Once a bullet enters the pelvis, it's surrounded by a rounded bone structure so it should be expected to ricochet around causing damage to a variety of "sensative" organs. I cant imagine a better, more painful area to put a bullet into, if you want the attacker to stop.
10mm4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 20:35   #265
Ebb27
Senior Member
 
Ebb27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the mountains
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally posted by 10mm4ever
My natural reaction would be to aim for the most stationary parts of the body, and aim low. The head can move independant of the body and taking the time to go for an atypical movielike headshot, may give the aggressor all the time he needs to kill you(remember, he's throwing bullets as well)?? Once a bullet enters the pelvis, it's surrounded by a rounded bone structure so it should be expected to ricochet around causing damage to a variety of "sensative" organs. I cant imagine a better, more painful area to put a bullet into, if you want the attacker to stop.
+1

I'm gonna take a shot at whatevers exposed. Peferably COM especially a good thoracic triangle shot, but hey if I have to shoot 'em in the foot I'll take what I can get.

Ideally you'd like to put them away quickly, but even if you can just slow them down or do them an injury it improves your own chances of winning or getting away alive. I'm not a cop I don't have to take them into custody, if a shot to the pelvis or legs takes away their mobility that's a definite plus for me.

Still I'd go for a chest shot the higher the better given the oppurtunity. You might still take out a shoulder or disable an arm even if you're off a bit.
__________________
A Glock in the hand,
is worth two in the safe.
Ebb27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 18:28   #266
agentl074
Senior Member
 
agentl074's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 700
Why do you think the latest AFQC is double tap at center mass, then one shot to head. The threat HAS to be STOPPED ASAP. You react the way you train and you train so that you can react...
__________________
Student - Indiana University - Public Affairs
Veteran, USAF (Security Forces)
Indiana Law Enforcement Training Board (Pre-Basic Certified)
*Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty*
agentl074 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 18:43   #267
Alaskapopo
NRA ENDOWMENT
 
Alaskapopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 16,457


Quote:
Originally posted by agentl074
Why do you think the latest AFQC is double tap at center mass, then one shot to head. The threat HAS to be STOPPED ASAP. You react the way you train and you train so that you can react...
Actually thats more of an older AFQC. We still train that way in our quals but I belive the zipper method is better, Start at com and walk your rounds up to the head repeat as necessary. You can usually get more ammo on target in the same amount of time this way.
Pat
__________________
Colt M16/AR15/ 1911 & Glock Armorer.
Certified Firearms Instructor & Urban Rifle Instructor.
Completed SWAT Entry Team and SWAT Sniper courses.
NRA Endowment Member
USPSA B class

Last edited by Alaskapopo; 01-18-2007 at 18:47..
Alaskapopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 20:13   #268
agentl074
Senior Member
 
agentl074's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 700
Is that like walkin the dog up the alley?
__________________
Student - Indiana University - Public Affairs
Veteran, USAF (Security Forces)
Indiana Law Enforcement Training Board (Pre-Basic Certified)
*Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty*
agentl074 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 23:16   #269
Cobra64
Deals in Facts
 
Cobra64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on where I am.
Posts: 17,821
Quote:
Originally posted by sneakyracer
"These offenders did not care about bullet weight or velocity. The majority of the offenders in both studies had been involved in prior shootings before assaulting or killing the officers. Their major concern was being “fast on the trigger” and delivering the bullet to its intended target. One stated, “There’s no time to sight up the gun. If you hesitate, you’re dead.
"

exactly why i think QK and point shooting training is paramount
That's why I don't like big bores. Target reaquisition is a *****. 9s are better for me in a heavier gun.
__________________
---------------------------
"your" or "you're" ?
"there" or "they're" or "their" ?
"to" or "too" ?
"then" or "than" ?
Cobra64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 01:17   #270
PBR Sailor
Senior Member
 
PBR Sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CONUS
Posts: 725
One shot stop ? Yeah, right! Like many of the people who posted on this thread have pointed out, one shot won't get the job done most of the time, regardless of caliber. Too much television is a bad thing and I wish people were more aware of the real world on this subject.

Good general rules for a firefight, regardless of choice of firearm, are:

1) Put a sufficient number of rounds on the problem to neutralize/minimize the threat. I don't believe anyone knows how many rounds that may be.

2) Don't break cover right away. The threat could just be injured and waiting to ambush you. Like Mom always said, patience is a virtue.

3) If you are alone and if possible, get help on scene before approaching the threat after the armed engagement.

Remember, hero is a name for a great sandwich and the term hero does not apply in a real world firefight. Don't be a sandwich or you'll get eaten alive !!!!!
__________________
Guerre 'A Mort

Last edited by PBR Sailor; 01-24-2007 at 10:56..
PBR Sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 13:56   #271
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
2 in the chest 1 in the head and the rest whereever they hit till he stops twitching
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2007, 21:58   #272
OldRonin
Member
 
OldRonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 73
Army switch to .45's

Part One: Regarding the story of the .38 not stopping the Filipino's being the reason the army went looking for a larger round. My understanding is that in those days, the Cavalry were the elites, and what they wanted was a round that would put down a HORSE. So they went big bore. This I just read in G&A special issue on the 1911. I confess, I'm a .45 man, JHPs.

Part Two:
As for bullet placement, here's my perspective and training ritual after spending 15 years working inner city trauma ER. Aim upper chest straight on a line to his spine and walk up to the head until he drops.


Why? The thing that DROPS a man is to destroy the spinal cord or brain. Midline shots not only hit the great vessels in the thorax, but also have a higher probability of striking the spine.

In the trauma room, its trauma to the great vessels in the thorax (including the hear), plus dropped lungs that are the #2 quick killer. #1 is brain trauma. Actually brain shots don't KILL them as quickly, but they do put them out of action.

From the side, face shots are no good. You gotta hit the brain case.
I had a guy come in the door who had shot off his entire jaw, tongue, and nose with a 12 ga he'd put under his chin to attempt suicide... He was wide awake!

Gut shots, low chest shots, these guys can walk for miles.

BTW, with my last round in my mag, I DO train to go for the pelvis. From any angle, cracking the pelvis destroys the support structure required for the legs to support body weight. Those guys drop.


Just curious. Anyone out there want to confess to training themselves to focus on headshots as the main target?

I wish there were a good way to test that in the field. Hmmm....


Great thread, BTW.....
__________________
Dr. John
OldRonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2007, 14:37   #273
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
Long before I retired I worked on an HRT squad we had to qualify for it makeing a head shot at a run.
The course of fire was a modified El Presidente after a run of half mile the final stage being a BG behind several hostages only the head showing. We never knew how many targets we would be presented with during the run or what the range would be at the hostage this was done in full gear Pistol and long gun, the head shot was always set up as a pistol shot though. Usually as you cleared a corner or other obstruction. We did that four or five times a year, besides regular qualifacation. But HRT did it in any weather from 105 summer to 10 below indchill and snow and ice.
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2007, 16:44   #274
OldRonin
Member
 
OldRonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 73
Head shots

So I take it that you were able to reliably make your head shots. Can we imply then that give sufficient training, making the head your primary target is a practical choice, even under high stress conditions? I assumed you qualified each time.

So, translating that to a personal self-defense situation, and the BG was likely to hurt someone if he wasn't neutralized ASAP, would you make all your shots to the head? If not, why not?

Sorry for all the questions, but my "hobby" the study of close quarters combatives, and I'm always trying to get ideas and information from as many people as possible.

Thanks,

John
__________________
Dr. John
OldRonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 13:15   #275
blinddog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Kansas 5 miles from nowhere
Posts: 1,771
I guess your question was directed at me. Mainly no a head shot is not a good choice becase the head moves, for defensive use the largest part of the body is ALWAYS the best target,and multiple hits are ALWAYS desirable. Just be able to articulate what you shot the perp several times. Remember you shoot someone to stop the threat they pose to you or others, if you have to shoot them several times to make sure the threat was stopped then so be it, just be ready for the Monday Morning quarterbacks.
I was trained for possible Hostage rescue worst case conditions. No I did not qualify every time first time around, but training is not real life so when you screw up in training you do it over til it is done right. The way we were trained was to simulate stress so we ran and jumped barracades and crawled through and over obsticals with the simulation being set up differant each time, Our training officer devised things to make us think on our feet.
Load out was besides body armor, a pistol with two loaded mags Glock 21 40 rds of 45 ACP, a long gun and fifty-ninety rounds, could be shotgun, or AR. We were not intended to be in any long term shoot outs, till after Hollywood happened then the ammo load was doubled for the long guns. our course of fire was at the county Sheriffs Farm out in a wooded pasture we set up/ Built a tire house with four rooms and two exits that was always a part of the training with somtimes several targets set up somtimes citizens ( if you are familiar with the shoot no shoot type targets you understand what I mean) the training was set up so we had to transition alll through the course of fire and we were timed with a limit so if it was a quarter mile we got maybe three or four minutes to complete the course of fire. For saftey this was run individually. We also did team entry stuff.Like I have said before with a hand gun there is no such thing as a one shot stop. Unless you feel you may have a need to get that level of profficiancy, the time and expence is really not woth the effort. If however you are in a line of work that puts you in harms way then by all means get as much training as you can, and use every means to get more.
__________________
You cannot always live as you wish, but you must always live as you can
G21 Club #0221
blinddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 694
169 Members
525 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42