GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2005, 00:45   #1
clark_kent
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 30
believe it or not

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

have u guys seen this?
clark_kent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 00:52   #2
horge
Lifetime Membership
-=-=-=-=-
 
horge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: almost home
Posts: 3,070
Yes.
When that thing first reared its backward head, quite some time ago,
it was debunked rather thoroughly on several online forums.
__________________
-BoG Hog #12
-Model 1911 Club member #111
horge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 00:57   #3
clark_kent
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 30
i just find it interesting, specially after i saw an episode abt 9/11, i don't remember if it's the discovery channel or not. but the epiode discuss a full detail on wat happen on 9/11 but little did they show anything abt the pentagon.

oh wel, to guys who haven't seen it. u may find it interesting nice day to u all
clark_kent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 07:23   #4
horge
Lifetime Membership
-=-=-=-=-
 
horge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: almost home
Posts: 3,070
Well, it IS interesting
I forgot to thank you for sharing it with us!
Thanks!

__________________
-BoG Hog #12
-Model 1911 Club member #111
horge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 08:04   #5
st. matthew
c_w@_u_need_2_c
 
st. matthew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,440
;P ^8 like the other lies and cover-ups , we will never know..
xfiles?
st. matthew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 08:14   #6
toxic
Senior Member
 
toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: doin' time
Posts: 1,491
well we can never know, there are lots of unexplained mysteries out there. but i give it to those guys who are behind these events..man just imagine how much time and effort they have spend planning and the logistics, Hope they sleep well at night.
__________________
ONE FALSE MOVE MEANS DISASTER:nsb:
toxic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 13:53   #7
theTactician
Senior Member
 
theTactician's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: underneath your bed
Posts: 983
this could be included in "the Unexplained" list... like UFO's and stuff..? Roswell? Bermuda triangle mystery? government hiding something.. so they say. :-)
Have you guys seen Farenheit 9/11?
History channel's "Zero Hour" episode?
mysterious huh? anyway, these are all just pure speculations. we'll never know until the truth eventually surfaces.
__________________
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt. - Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Warriors take chances. Like everyone else, they fear failing, but they refuse to let fear control them.- Samurai
theTactician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 14:38   #8
bulm540
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,510
You know how thick the walls of the pentagon is?? No wonder there was no 757 because it disintegrated after impact. ALuminum vs. a couple of feet of concrete.
__________________
formerly known as bulm5
bulm540 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 10:18   #9
isuzu
Senior Member
 
isuzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 4,173
Not True! The one who made the video was probable some left-wing anti-war organization based in the UK.

Pentagon, being the center of military operations of the US is designed to handle tremendous forces or impacts. Over the years, the structure was improved. That is why the airplane didn't stand a chance when it hit the Pentagon.

As to why there weren't any big parts of the airplane that were recovered:

1. The airplane was travelling at cruising speed in a clean configuration when it hit the Pentagon. I'm no physicist, but when an object hits a highly fortified wall with tremdous momentum, it would just have disintegrated.

If you recall the Cebu Pacific plane that went out of its original flight path, and eventually slammed on a mountain in Cagayan de Oro, they weren't able to recover the fuselage. Authorities were only able to recover the tail portion of the plane. Considering that the mountain is much softer than the Pentagon walls.

2. Burning fuel may have melted the metal parts; that's why the World Trade Center buckled and finally collapsed. Jet fuel burns hotter than regular gas. Of course, jet A-1 is refined kerosene, but additives makes it burn efficiently and hotter.

As to why witnesses failed to see a big plane:

1. An airplane flying at 580 mph (about 500 knots)is very hard to see. Even the security cameras failed to capture a clear image of the plane due to the speed it was travelling.

As to why the film clip questioned the capabilities of the pilot to fly "that the pilots were incompetent":

1. You don't really need a good pilot to fly that kind of plane in that kind of mission. All that the pilots wanted to know is to maneuver the plane to a certain bearing and hit its intended target. When the flight instructors of the suicide pilots were investigated, some even said that the student pilots "weren't particular with takeoff and landing(they took over the controls of the airplane in mid-air anyway). They were just concentrated on straight and level flight, and certain maneuvers.

Modern passenger planes are very sophisticated (with many redundant safety features) that a pilot once told me that once you engaged the auto-pilot (which has been pre-programmed by flight dispatch), they are just relegated to monitoring gauges, reporting their position, and making sure the passengers are comfortable(by having a flight crew inside the cockpit). The next time they would touch the flight controls (pedal and yoke) is when they disengaged the auto-pilot prior to reaching the aerodome of their destination or make emergency corrections.

Last edited by isuzu; 12-04-2005 at 11:58..
isuzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 19:33   #10
gundog
senior gunner
 
gundog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: QC
Posts: 1,545
Send a message via Yahoo to gundog
Re: believe it or not

Quote:
Originally posted by clark_kent
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

have u guys seen this?
another version of the pentagon strike...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html
gundog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 20:09   #11
bulm540
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,510
Quote:
Originally posted by isuzu
Not True! The one who made the video was probable some left-wing anti-war organization based in the UK.

Pentagon, being the center of military operations of the US is designed to handle tremendous forces or impacts. Over the years, the structure was improved. That is why the airplane didn't stand a chance when it hit the Pentagon.

As to why there weren't any big parts of the airplane that were recovered:

1. The airplane was travelling at cruising speed in a clean configuration when it hit the Pentagon. I'm no physicist, but when an object hits a highly fortified wall with tremdous momentum, it would just have disintegrated.

If you recall the Cebu Pacific plane that went out of its original flight path, and eventually slammed on a mountain in Cagayan de Oro, they weren't able to recover the fuselage. Authorities were only able to recover the tail portion of the plane. Considering that the mountain is much softer than the Pentagon walls.

2. Burning fuel may have melted the metal parts; that's why the World Trade Center buckled and finally collapsed. Jet fuel burns hotter than regular gas. Of course, jet A-1 is refined kerosene, but additives makes it burn efficiently and hotter.

As to why witnesses failed to see a big plane:

1. An airplane flying at 580 mph (about 500 knots)is very hard to see. Even the security cameras failed to capture a clear image of the plane due to the speed it was travelling.

As to why the film clip questioned the capabilities of the pilot to fly "that the pilots were incompetent":

1. You don't really need a good pilot to fly that kind of plane in that kind of mission. All that the pilots wanted to know is to maneuver the plane to a certain bearing and hit its intended target. When the flight instructors of the suicide pilots were investigated, some even said that the student pilots "weren't particular with takeoff and landing(they took over the controls of the airplane in mid-air anyway). They were just concentrated on straight and level flight, and certain maneuvers.

Modern passenger planes are very sophisticated (with many redundant safety features) that a pilot once told me that once you engaged the auto-pilot (which has been pre-programmed by flight dispatch), they are just relegated to monitoring gauges, reporting their position, and making sure the passengers are comfortable(by having a flight crew inside the cockpit). The next time they would touch the flight controls (pedal and yoke) is when they disengaged the auto-pilot prior to reaching the aerodome of their destination or make

emergency corrections.
Ditto!!!
__________________
formerly known as bulm5
bulm540 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,376
369 Members
1,007 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42