Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2006, 13:36   #1
Gold Membership
fitz4609's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North of the Valley
Posts: 1,076
attacks on US carriers

I have another history type question.
Aside from the political ramifications, was there some reason that US aircraft carriers were never attacked from North Vietnam by Mig-17s or Mig 19s?
Would it not have been possible that during the return of one our strike groups a mig could not have made its way past our CAPs to attack?
What about a low level below radar approach?
It's the things that we're afraid of that will show us what we're made of, in the end.
fitz4609 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 13:41   #2
Reload Artist
lcarreau's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 13,125
Send a message via AIM to lcarreau Send a message via Yahoo to lcarreau

Carrier groups are very heavily defended with the carrier being in the very center of the group. You may recall a few years back where we accidently shot down a jetliner because a destroyer mistook it for an attacking aircraft. I believe carriers are just about the most heavily defended of any of our miltary assets.

lcarreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 17:02   #3
Salty Dog
Navy87Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stafford VA
Posts: 1,532
As far as carriers in Vietnam, most of the enemy aircraft weren't capable of the kind of overwater flight it would have required. They typically operate under Ground Control Intercept (GCI), which means that a radar operator on the beach tells the pilot where to go and what to do. That doesn't work so well over water.

We also have "delousing" procedures that we use to identify friendly aircraft returning from the beach. It would be hard to blend in with a returning strike package and not be detected.

Even if they did make it out, there are always picket ships stationed to provide air defense coverage for the carriers, along with Combat Air Patrol (CAP) stations manned by fighters specifically to intercept incoming bad guys.

So short answer...not likely that a third-world opponent could mount a successful attack against a carrier at sea. Then or now.

For lcarreau --

The incident you were referring to was the USS VINCENNES shooting of the Iranian Air Bus in 1988. VINCENNES was an AEGIS cruiser, not a destroyer. Lots of things went wrong that day and tensions in the Gulf were high due to to the ongoing Tanker Wars and attacks by Iranian patrol boats on tankers and merchants in the region. There is no doubt that mistakes were made by the crew of VINCENNES, but given the info they had available at the time, they made the decision based on the safety of the ship and crew.

Beretta 92G Vertec - M9 - PX 4 Storm 9mm - 92 Billennium - CX 4 Storm 9mm
CZ SP-01 Tactical - Ruger KP93 - M&P 9C - M&P 9
RIA .45 ACP 5" 1911 - KelTec P-32
Stag AR-15 2T, Saiga 7.62x39 AK, S12 Tactical Shotgun

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Navy87Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 18:40   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: wendel n.c.
Posts: 4,805
bet if they had a french exocet missle(like the argintine air force used to destroy the english HMS Shetfield was it?)they could have.but it was a decade later and more relivant the NVA werent likly to get French missles or even French fries for that matter.
spober is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 498
96 Members
402 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03