GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2007, 17:04   #1
roar
.38 Special
 
roar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,258
Send a message via AIM to roar
Castle Doctrine, right?

I have read that Washington State is a Castle Doctrine state. I just wanted to get this confirmed by my fellow Washingtonians who have been involved with firearms longer than I have.

Thanks!
roar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 14:48   #2
ChristopherG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 293
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.16.050

That's the law on justifiable homicide in WA (by a non-LEO). If there is another law that relates specifically to what is called the 'castle doctrine' in some other states, I don't know about it (but I'm always willing to learn!).
ChristopherG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 17:38   #3
roar
.38 Special
 
roar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,258
Send a message via AIM to roar
Thanks for the information, I suppose I should have taken the time to look for that myself.

I have heard further information that Washington State is a "Stand your ground" state, but isn't technically a full blown Castle Doctrine state. You can still be sued by the bad guy's family even if you aren't charged criminally.
roar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 11:31   #4
WSUXJer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 124
There is an RCW that does state:

"No person in the state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting by any reasonable means necessary, himself or herself, his or her family, or his or her real or personal property, or for coming to the aid of another who is in imminent danger of or the victim of assault, robbery, kidnapping, arson, burglary, rape, murder, or any other violent crime as defined in RCW 9.94A.030"

but I don't remember what the actual RCW for that statement is.

Last edited by WSUXJer; 03-01-2007 at 11:33..
WSUXJer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 11:51   #5
ChristopherG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 293
9a.16.110
ChristopherG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 12:35   #6
roar
.38 Special
 
roar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,258
Send a message via AIM to roar
That RCW sounds an awful lot like a Castle Doctrine type law; just without the cool name.
roar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,158
337 Members
821 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42