GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2007, 04:28   #1
jmb79
Senior Member
 
jmb79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,649
Rep. Steve Buyer's weasel words...

About six weeks ago I wrote Congressman Steve Buyer regarding H.R. 1022 (the new proposed weapons ban that makes the 1994 ban seem almost benign by comparison). Yesterday I received a letter back from Rep. Buyer.

I will try to scan the letter later this morning so you can read it for yourselves but in the meantime...

Paragraph 1 thanks me for writing.

Paragraph 2 mentions that Buyer opposed the 1994 ban when it was enacted.

Paragraph 3 gives a brief 2 sentence description of the new legislation and mentions that it has been referred to House Judiciary Committee.

Paragraph 4 reads: "Please be assured I will recall your concerns with H.R. 1022 should this measure come to the House floor."

Frankly, I am disappointed with the "weasel words" in Paragraph 4. Buyer (or his office staff) has refused to take a stand against H.R. 1022. He has left himself room to vote either up or down on H.R. 1022 should it even reach the house floor. He could still vote for the a new ban without breaking his promise to have recalled my letter before his vote.

I expected more from a man who is a graduate of the Citadel and served in the Army (albeit as an attorney with the Judge Advocate General's Office).

I note that the letter is not hand signed and is most likely a form letter. Does anyone have any thoughts whether this form letter is sent only regarding H.R.1022 bill or whether a virtually identical letter is sent regarding any bill about which a constituent writes?

Do any of you have any experience with Buyer and/or his stand on Second Amendment rights?

I am going to reply to Buyer's letter expressing my displeasure at his failure to take a stand on H.R. 1022.
jmb79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 14:29   #2
epsylum
Boolit Hoze
 
epsylum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Racing Capital, USA
Posts: 14,373


That is more than my rep. (Julia Carson) would do.

__________________
Quote:
What are you having trouble with? I'll teach it some respect.
Epsylum (EE-SAI-LUM)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
epsylum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 17:24   #3
sjstill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I got the identical letter, and my thoughts were the same as yours. I'm really disappointed, but not surprised.


On a more positive note, my City County Councillor actually called me back today re: Proposal 174. He is against it too, and I detected no wishy-washy in the conversation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 21:12   #4
rhino465
Senior Member
 
rhino465's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 3,179
Send a message via Yahoo to rhino465
I recevied a Buyer letter this week, but I have not yet opened it. I suspect it will be identical to the others.

His voting record is pretty good. GOA rates him at an A- (I think).

As far being a grad of the Citadel and being in the military . . . I don't see much correlation between either and being pro-RKBA. It's disappointing, though, because we expect better from Hoosier congress critters (who are not the Zombie Woman or her ilk).
rhino465 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 15:35   #5
Inverness11
Standard Member
 
Inverness11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 372
I got the same letter and was disappointed that he seems to be riding the fence on this one. IIRC he has a very pro RKBA voting record, hopefully he'll keep it up.
Inverness11 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:28.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,124
321 Members
803 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31