GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2007, 21:20   #1
jtm62
CLM Number 148
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jtm62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburghish, PA
Posts: 1,639
My first real attempt at photography... (Not 56K friendly)

So... I'm looking for some critiques, constructive criticism of sorts.

The camera used was a Nikon D40X.

For the following shots a Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6 was used.


Taken at Ohiopyle, in Fayette County Pennsylvania, I think this is the best shot... although a little too bright.

Click the image to open in full size.


Same place, a picture of the falls:

Click the image to open in full size.

Fire picture, back at camp:

Click the image to open in full size.

Motion shot, utilizing the 3 frames per second feature:

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.


These two images were taken with a Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D:

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Not really a fan of the way the focus fell on those two images. How can I improve the focus and pull the whole serial into the focus area?


Thanks for looking.

Josh
__________________
"Don't give up... don't ever give up!"
-Jimmy Valvano
jtm62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 02:34   #2
Halliday
Member
 
Halliday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 29
I like the fire picture.
On your question about the last two, what was your f-stop? You are using a tripod? Put your f-stop to at least f8 to get more detail in focus.
Halliday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 02:54   #3
SMSTRICK
"WE THE PEOPLE"
 
SMSTRICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,926
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t73/smstrick69/testnature.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>

jtm62,

I doctored this up a little and changed up a little on the brightness and the contrast. Compare it to the original and tell me what you thing.
SMSTRICK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 16:08   #4
jtm62
CLM Number 148
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jtm62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburghish, PA
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally posted by SMSTRICK
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t73/smstrick69/testnature.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>

jtm62,

I doctored this up a little and changed up a little on the brightness and the contrast. Compare it to the original and tell me what you thing.

SMSTRICK,

This retouched image is very much more better! Did you use photoshop to do it?
__________________
"Don't give up... don't ever give up!"
-Jimmy Valvano
jtm62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 16:13   #5
jtm62
CLM Number 148
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jtm62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburghish, PA
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally posted by Halliday
I like the fire picture.
On your question about the last two, what was your f-stop? You are using a tripod? Put your f-stop to at least f8 to get more detail in focus.
The f-stop was set to 32, the only setting that will work with the camera, it seems. I can't figure it out?

And I did not use a tripod... as The end of the camera len must be a mere 6-8 inches from the object in focus to take a picture that clear.
__________________
"Don't give up... don't ever give up!"
-Jimmy Valvano
jtm62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 16:33   #6
hwyhobo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,442


Re: My first real attempt at photography... (Not 56K friendly)

Quote:
Originally posted by jtm62
So... I'm looking for some critiques, constructive criticism of sorts.
The first photo was taken at @150mm focal length, but the speed used was 1/125s (relatively slow for that focal length), which resulted in a slight movement blur.
hwyhobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 16:58   #7
MrsKitty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: >^..^<
Posts: 47,645
To get rid of that bright, washed out look in the first shot a circular polarizer is what you need (not LINEAR!). It is a special kind of dark glass filter and it will cost you a couple of f/stops but it eliminates the glare and puts the blue back in the sky.

On the fire, I would have liked to see the top of the flame and less of the dark along the bottom. That is just a preference and your way is fine!
__________________
to cry with a friend is a warm hug..no words need to be spoken... --bob
Woof, Woof!
MrsKitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 17:59   #8
jtm62
CLM Number 148
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jtm62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburghish, PA
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally posted by misskitty5077
To get rid of that bright, washed out look in the first shot a circular polarizer is what you need (not LINEAR!). It is a special kind of dark glass filter and it will cost you a couple of f/stops but it eliminates the glare and puts the blue back in the sky.

On the fire, I would have liked to see the top of the flame and less of the dark along the bottom. That is just a preference and your way is fine!
I do have to pick up some lens filters/polarizers... I did realize that as soon as I saw how bright it was.

And MissKitty... they aren't as good but...

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
"Don't give up... don't ever give up!"
-Jimmy Valvano
jtm62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 21:02   #9
MrsKitty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: >^..^<
Posts: 47,645
They are PLENTY good. Especially for a first attempt!

Anybody got any marshmallows?
__________________
to cry with a friend is a warm hug..no words need to be spoken... --bob
Woof, Woof!
MrsKitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 22:45   #10
Aaron S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 456
Your 2 serial number pictures were taken at f/5 according to the embedded data. That should have been good enough I would think, except when taking pictures that close, there is very limited depth of field. If you would have shot the pictures exactly straight on or used a bigger f/number they would have been in focus across the entire frame.

On Nikons, the lens has to be set to f/32 because the apeture is adjusted electronically in the body. I don't know how to set the apeture on the D40x. Set the mode to A and check the manual to find how to change the apeture. You will need a tripod also because the shutter speed will drop.

Aaron
Aaron S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 22:58   #11
SMSTRICK
"WE THE PEOPLE"
 
SMSTRICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally posted by jtm62
SMSTRICK,

This retouched image is very much more better! Did you use photoshop to do it?
It is a Kodak program that came with my camera. I downloaded it and use it to enhance and alter pictures. I'm not sure exactly what the program is , because I did'nt even doanload it to my computer. It was a gift, and they set it up for me, But I do know that it is a Kodak / Photo program.
SMSTRICK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 11:15   #12
sjfrellc
CLM Number 92
Charter Lifetime Member
 
sjfrellc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Posts: 1,885


Try using Picasa(free from Google) for simple color/contrast improvements like in the first picture. It works great and has a small learning curve. It also has a button to reveal simple exif data(the fstop, shutter speed, etc.) We can read your data with Opanda software (also free).
This is the kind of EXIF data Opanda reports on the last picture:

[Image]
Make = NIKON CORPORATION
Model = NIKON D40X

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/60"
F Number = F5
Exposure Program = Not defined
ISO Speed Ratings = 200
Exif Version = Version 2.21
Date Time Original = 2007-06-16 18:02:36
Date Time Digitized = 2007-06-16 18:02:36
Components Configuration = YCbcr
Compressed Bits Per Pixel = 4
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F4.92
Metering Mode = Pattern
Light Source = unknown
Flash = Flash fired, auto mode, return light detected
Focal Length = 60mm
Maker Note = 27248 Byte
User Comment =
Subsec Time = 0.50"
Subsec Time Original = 0.50"
Subsec Time Digitized = 0.50"
Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 3872
Exif Image Height = 2592
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 28100
Sensing Method = One-chip color area sensor
File Source = DSC
Scene Type = A directly photographed image
CFA Pattern = [G,B],
[R,G]
Custom Rendered = Normal process
Exposure Mode = Auto exposure
White Balance = Auto white balance
Digital Zoom Ratio = 1x
Focal Length In 35mm Film = 90mm
Scene Capture Type = Normal
Gain Control = None
Contrast = Normal
Saturation = Normal
Sharpness = Normal
Subject Distance Range = unknown

[MakerNote (Nikon)]
Makernote Version = 0210
ISO Speed Used = 200
Colour Mode = COLOR
Quality = FINE
White Balance = AUTO
Sharpening = AUTO
Focus Mode = MANUAL
Flash Setting = NORMAL
Auto Flash Mode = Built-in,TTL
White Balance Bias Value = 0
White Balance Red, Blue Coefficients = 453/256, 340/256, 256/256, 256/256
000D = 00, 01, 06, 00
Exposure Diff = 8F, 01, 0C, 00
ThumbOffset = 2694
Flash Compensation = 00, 01, 06, 00
ISO Speed Requested = 200
Tone Compensation (Contrast) = AUTO
Lens Type = 2
Lens Min/Max Focal Length, Max Aperture = 600/10, 600/10, 28/10, 28/10
Flash Used = Flash Fired
Auto Focus Area = 00, 00, 00, 00
Bracketing & Shooting Mode = 1
008A = 2
008B = 54, 01, 0C, 00
Colour Mode = MODE3a
Lighting Type = SPEEDLIGHT




The serial numbers are out of focus simply because they are tilted and not in the same plane. As mentioned above, the depth of field is very shallow at f5, but macro lenses also has a very narrow plane of focus.
sjfrellc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,092
499 Members
593 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36