Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2007, 05:28   #1
ede
Bama's Friend
 
ede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 10,071
Wal Mart No CCW

is it that way at all the wal marts or just the local one to me? it's the only one i've ever seen posted but i don't got to it or any others very often. the sign isn't colored very well to make it stand out more like it's colored to make it somewhat unnoticable.
__________________
Team CARVER Custom
GSSF & NRA Life Member
Steel Challenge, USPSA
PM Black Diamond 538 F&AM
Bamatrooper taught Chuck Norris how to shoot.
ede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 06:36   #2
cellison1460
Senior Member
 
cellison1460's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 284
Which Wal Mart is posted?

I live within 20 miles of five Wal Mart stores and none of them are posted.
cellison1460 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 18:11   #3
degoodman
Out of Columbus
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 3,953
Send a message via AIM to degoodman
The one here in Marysville has posted the Liquor Department firearms notice on their front door for several months now.

Is it a posting, or a notice based upon the CCW arrest in Marion County AT A WALMART, for vioating the class D permit provision in 2923 (Both stores have active class D permits for sunday sales). I'll let you know after the court case ends and we hear the results.
degoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 03:24   #4
ede
Bama's Friend
 
ede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 10,071
i'd have to look again to be sure but basically it's the pistol with the slash across it and a "no weapons allowed on premiss" sign
ede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 14:52   #5
anyplainjoe
Nobody special.
 
anyplainjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In flyover country
Posts: 3,864


If a place sells(in any form) beer/booze, don't carry in there.
__________________
In Ohio? Check out the Buckeye Firearms Association at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
anyplainjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 18:28   #6
Brian Dover
Senior Member
 
Brian Dover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,446
Call WalMart corporate with the manager's name and store's location. Chances are good that somebody local got carried away.

Degoodman, I've heard some about that Marion arrest. In spite of the fact that the town has LOTS of "gunbuster" signage (local police chief must be an anti-gunner), the story of that incident sounds strange. Would love to know just what really went on.
__________________
"Rex, you shot him in the head!---How do you feel about that?" --'Rustler's Rhapsody'
Brian Dover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 00:19   #7
glockess56
CLM Number 295
Charter Lifetime Member
 
glockess56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 1,331
I haven't seen any Wal-Marts in central Ohio posted. I go into the Lewis Center, Bethel Rd, Morse Rd and occationally the one in Reynoldsburg and haven't seen any signs. In fact, isn't that where people go after they get their CCW - into Wal-Mart and order nachos? That used to be a thing someplace on GT!
glockess56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 09:25   #8
degoodman
Out of Columbus
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 3,953
Send a message via AIM to degoodman
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Dover
Call WalMart corporate with the manager's name and store's location. Chances are good that somebody local got carried away.

Degoodman, I've heard some about that Marion arrest. In spite of the fact that the town has LOTS of "gunbuster" signage (local police chief must be an anti-gunner), the story of that incident sounds strange. Would love to know just what really went on.
We won't know much more until the trial or after. Ken Hanson is the guy's attorney, so he's got the resident expert on the subject in his corner. I'm sure there's been discovery and all, but Ken's bound by confidentiality, so we won't be hearing anything until it's a matter of record in a trial court.

The situation as I understand it was that the CCW exited his vehicle with a pistol in a holster which another patron saw as he was covering up (and remember open carry is also legal here in most jurisdictions). The patron made the "man with a gun" call. The CCW went into the wal-mart, shopped for 30 - 45 minutes, checked out and returned to his vehicle. While exiting the store, the man was approached by a deputy sheriff, and he dutifully notified the sheriff as required by law. The Sheriff then questioned him as to whether he was just shopping inside that walmart, which he verified that he was. The sheriff then took custody of the mans weapon and placed him under arrest for a violation of ORC 2923.121(A). The walmart in question has a valid Class D-6 liqour permit authorizing sunday sales, and that was the basis for the arrest.
degoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 09:41   #9
firedog978
Senior Member
 
firedog978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 795
We certainly need a clear understanding of this portion of the law. Hopefully, this case will turn out well for the defendant and set a precedent.
I think as it stands right now, it depends on the jurisdiction where one enters such an establishment. I am aware of a couple of incidents whereby an LEO contact (routine), occured in similar (class D) establishments and no arrest was made. We can't however depend on ccw friendly jurisdictions to interpret the law as meaning 'consumed' and not 'sold'. It's just to vague and open to interpretation as it stands.
Ken Hanson is certainly the guy to defend this man. If it is to be won and set a precedent, Ken's the guy to do so.
__________________
A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. -- G. Gordon Liddy

Last edited by firedog978; 09-10-2007 at 09:43..
firedog978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 10:14   #10
Blitzer
Cool Cat
 
Blitzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The communist's play ground of OHIO
Posts: 26,617
Send a message via AIM to Blitzer Send a message via Yahoo to Blitzer
Quote:
Originally posted by degoodman
We won't know much more until the trial or after. Ken Hanson is the guy's attorney, so he's got the resident expert on the subject in his corner. I'm sure there's been discovery and all, but Ken's bound by confidentiality, so we won't be hearing anything until it's a matter of record in a trial court.

The situation as I understand it was that the CCW exited his vehicle with a pistol in a holster which another patron saw as he was covering up (and remember open carry is also legal here in most jurisdictions). The patron made the "man with a gun" call. The CCW went into the wal-mart, shopped for 30 - 45 minutes, checked out and returned to his vehicle. While exiting the store, the man was approached by a deputy sheriff, and he dutifully notified the sheriff as required by law. The Sheriff then questioned him as to whether he was just shopping inside that walmart, which he verified that he was. The sheriff then took custody of the mans weapon and placed him under arrest for a violation of ORC 2923.121(A). The walmart in question has a valid Class D-6 liqour permit authorizing sunday sales, and that was the basis for the arrest.
"Man with a gun", farging soccer moms and girly men.
__________________
It doesn't matter what the Joe on the street thinks, it is who pays the biggest bribes to the electoral college gets elected as President! :crying:
Blitzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 22:19   #11
G37 Commando
Registered User
 
G37 Commando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 346
Maybe I missed something, but I thought our CCW law stated that establishments serving alcohol was off limits, not ones that sold it.
G37 Commando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 01:09   #12
degoodman
Out of Columbus
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 3,953
Send a message via AIM to degoodman
Quote:
Originally posted by G37 Commando
Maybe I missed something, but I thought our CCW law stated that establishments serving alcohol was off limits, not ones that sold it.
That's what you get for assuming things not in the codes. People have assumed that the prohibition applies only to premises licensed for on-site consumption, that it only applies to liquor sales and not beer, and several other variations on the theme. Here's the EXACT statute from the ORC:

2923.121(A) No person shall possess a firearm in any room in which liquor is being dispensed in premises for which a D permit has been issued under Chapter 4303. of the Revised Code or in an open air arena for which a permit of that nature has been issued.

That's it. No other words.

Here are the key points.

"Dispensed" is a word not defined in the ORC with an exact legal meaning. The dictionary definition (and keep in mind that the "legal" definition of a word as established by case law or statute can be QUITE different from its "dictionary" definition) of dispensed is "to be sold by portions". Sold, well alcohol is being sold plainly enough. "Portions" is another hangup for many, who assume that portions means "by the drink" for on site consumption. That is a very grave stretch. A 12 ounce bottle of beer is a portion, as is a 750ml of wine or a liter of booze, as are lesser portions of the bottle sold by the drink. Where does the line for "portion" fall? A pharmacist dispenses drugs, and some of the "portions" they dispense are whole sealed containers. The point being is that people who are relying on the "by the drink" definition of "portions" are relying on a hyper-narrow interpretation of portion, one which does not hold up under comparison to other "book" definitions, or other areas of law.

The next point is that the statute mentions class D permit, and it makes NO exception based on the type of Class D permit. MOST class D permits are for establishments that sell alcohol for on site consumption of alcohol. However one type, the class D-6 permit is not for on site consumption. That permit authorizes sunday sales of alcohol. It is still a class D permit however, so by the black letter of the law, any establishment possessing one is off-limits for carry, including any grocery store, gas station, and carry out that sells beer on sunday.

The last point is closely tied to the previous point. NOWHERE in the exact text of the statute is the word "consumption" mentioned anywhere. Whether the alcohol is consumed on site or not makes absolutely no difference. It's just not in the statute. If the alcohol is sold by portions, and sealed retail containers are portions by the book definition, and the establishment has a class D permit, including the class D-6 permit for sunday sales, then carry is prohibited under current black letter law.

If you read the AG's pamphlet carefully regarding these points, you'll notice several things. The first is that the AG mentions VERY SPECIFICALLY that the pamphlet does not constitute legal advice. Second, the language mentions that the class D permit is GENERALLY for places where alcohol is sold for consumption, but the language does not exclude the possibility of exceptions by more stringent language including words like ONLY. Third, The AG places the burden on the citizen to verify the type of permit that an establishment has been issued.

So until there's some case law established by courts of appeal, and ultimately the Ohio Supreme Court, and that could take YEARS, you are taking definite risks by carrying in ANY establishment that has a Class D permit of any type issued for it, including premises that do not authorize on-premises consumption, but have a Class D-6 permit authorizing sunday sales of alcohol.

It would be nice to eliminate the alcohol rule completely, but I'd lay money on hell freezing over before that any day of the week. It just won't happen in our legislature. We could go for a 51% rule, but that would add further complexity to our already convaluted liquor statutes as well as the carry statutes.

I think that as good a way as any to proceed would be to press the legislature to create a separate classification of liquor permit, the C-3 permit, authorizing sunday sales for retail establishments, and leaving the D-6 permit for sunday sales at establishments authorizing on-site consumption. That way it could be sold as an "administrative clarification" of the liquor law, as opposed to a "gun bill" which might allow it to slip through the legislature relatively unnoticed. They already have a seperate fee schedule based on whether the D-6 suppliments a class C permit or a class D permit, so just separate the permits. The nice side effect is that is clarifies the situation for CCW holders immensely.

The other change I'd press for is that any liquor licensee who is statutorially prohibited from CCW should have to display a STANDARDIZED sign, seperate from the optional sign usable by any private property owner, on the entrance to the establishment, eliminating any confusion regarding the permit status of the premises.
degoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 13:17   #13
ventura
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ohio
Posts: 173
Can someone tell me approximately when this arrest occured in Marion county? This is the first time I have heard of it and have not seen it discussed on any other forums.

Thanks

ventura
ventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 17:06   #14
degoodman
Out of Columbus
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 3,953
Send a message via AIM to degoodman
Quote:
Originally posted by ventura
Can someone tell me approximately when this arrest occured in Marion county? This is the first time I have heard of it and have not seen it discussed on any other forums.

Thanks

ventura
It was in mid-May, like a week before Memorial day. It has not garnered much media attention at this point, and thats probably a good thing for now.
degoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 19:34   #15
Catalina
Senior Member
 
Catalina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Coast of USA
Posts: 190
Great research degoodman.

If this poor sap gets convicted of CCW in a D6 dispensing booze our legal system is an ass.

What's that line from Shakespeare's Henry VI?
__________________
First line of defense against Canada on the shore of Lake Erie
Catalina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 19:38   #16
Brian Dover
Senior Member
 
Brian Dover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,446
I'd love to look at the details of this myself, but can't seem to find much of a Marion County Clerk of Courts site like some of the bigger counties have. But even so, it would probably be tough for someone with my meager computer skills to find the case in question without acase number, arrestee's name, or something.

Also, the folks at Ohioans For Concealed Carry have begun to discuss this situation on their forum, but nobody there seems to have any definitive info to work with. Degoodman, are there more details that can be shared?
__________________
"Rex, you shot him in the head!---How do you feel about that?" --'Rustler's Rhapsody'
Brian Dover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 14:30   #17
degoodman
Out of Columbus
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 3,953
Send a message via AIM to degoodman
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Dover
I'd love to look at the details of this myself, but can't seem to find much of a Marion County Clerk of Courts site like some of the bigger counties have. But even so, it would probably be tough for someone with my meager computer skills to find the case in question without acase number, arrestee's name, or something.

Also, the folks at Ohioans For Concealed Carry have begun to discuss this situation on their forum, but nobody there seems to have any definitive info to work with. Degoodman, are there more details that can be shared?
I don't have any more details than what I've given here.

Ken Hanson had mentioned a couple things, keeping in mind that he is currently bound by client confidentiality. First is that he would probably have more info in a week or two, leading me to believe that a plea agreement of some sort is being hammered out, but that's just a guess.

The other thing he mentioned is that until our CCW statute is fixed, we're screwed on carry into walmart, kroger, etc, which I'm guessing means that D-6 is just like the rest of the D permits, and CCW is a no-go in any establishment so licensed.

I, like everybody else, would like to have answers now, but it looks like we'll have to wait a week or two. Hopefully the plea agreement gets the guy down from the big-F down to some kind of misdemeanor and he gets to keep his guns, let alone his permit. But we'll see.
degoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 13:15   #18
Catalina
Senior Member
 
Catalina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Coast of USA
Posts: 190
Instead of a plea down I kinda hope they push the case and the D6 conundrum gets some case law (in our favor) behind it.
__________________
First line of defense against Canada on the shore of Lake Erie
Catalina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 13:31   #19
Dandapani
Senior Member
 
Dandapani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gulf side Florida
Posts: 22,803


Thanks to the Gods that I left the Great State of Ahia for a more sane state!
__________________
Dan
Karma -What goes around, comes around!
Florida Glockers, Wheelhouse, S&W, Snubbie #940
Dandapani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 22:30   #20
Thed
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: My compound in Ohio
Posts: 46
Makes me wonder how many of the approximately 100,000 license holders are aware of this or even read forums such as these.
Most probably figure dispensed means... well... dispensed.
No matter how the law is written there's always some Nazi somewhere ready to twist the meaning so they can harass some law abiding citizen. Truly sickening.
Thed is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,054
301 Members
753 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31