Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2007, 07:36   #1
Junior Member
brawnless's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Asia
Posts: 358
The Cons of having an Internal Lock on a Firearm

This is in response to the thread:


The Cons of having an Internal Lock on a Firearm

When the need to reach for a firearm arises, a life or lives would most probably be at stake. And the only time left to utilize what the tool is intended for may be no later than NOW. Any delay or malfunction at such a crucial moment could result in the unnecessary loss of lives.

Why is an internal lock on a firearm unnecessary?

First, more than an addition to the cost of firearms, an internal lock adds to the complexity of mechanical equipment in terms of more probability of failure and delay. It simply reduces the reliability of a firearm to perform when necessary. An internal lock adds more places for dirt, lint, grime, and rust to hold on to.

Second, firearms are not the only hazard that unsupervised children can come into contact with. There are more matches, insecticides, rat poisons, acids, knives and electrical outlets in the common household than firearms. How many children have fallen off balconies, drowned in ponds / tubs, and eaten firecrackers? The negligence of parents / guardians comes into question here.

Third, would having an internal lock on the firearm REDUCE the liability of a parent / guardian should an accidental discharge occur? It should in fact increase the liability of the parent / guardian simply because the child was left for a long enough time to overcome the internal lock! But what are the chances that an accidental discharge involving children and internally locked firearms would result in a more serious offense for the parents / guardians? Most likely, parents / guardians would be more inclined to leave children unsupervised for longer periods of time because the firearm is internally locked! Internally locked firearms would promote a false sense of safety.

Fourth, should the need to render a firearm inoperable arise, ammunition could be removed. Dismantle the firearm if a more drastic measure is called for. Most modern firearms can be taken apart without tools within seconds. It would be easier for a child to disengage the internal lock of a firearm when it finds the key compared to reassembling the firearm when it finds the barrel.

And finally, having an internally locked firearm does not promote firearm handling proficiency. It does the exact opposite. Mastering the “failure to fire” drills and “failure to eject drills” is now insufficient without learning the “failure to unlock” drill.

Remember KISS? Keep It Simple Stup..! Better yet, get a hammer.

Last edited by brawnless; 09-11-2007 at 07:40..
brawnless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 02:38   #2
Lifetime Membership
horge's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: almost home
Posts: 3,126
An integral trigger lock can be keyed off,
and then you throw away the key. Tapos agad.

As for whether it would increase firearm prices due
to retooling (new matrices for the widget and CNC plots
for the extra frame-milling), the resulting guns would
qualify for export to more places abroad, for increased
sales, so it's not a no-win for manufacturers nor
automatically a pricetag-bloater.

Still, it's a stupid requirement to make.
-BoG Hog #12
-Model 1911 Club member #111
horge is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:37.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 1,500
394 Members
1,106 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,535
Mar 26, 2015 at 13:43