Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2008, 21:34   #1
DonB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 312
SW 442 over the 642

I've noticed that more people seem to prefer the 442 over the 642. Is there a reason for this? I'm surprised really because the stainless finish is more durable for deep concealment. It even seems that the prices for the 442 are actually more than the 642. Is the trigger better on the blued guns or what? I'm asking because I'm going to buy one or the other. Was going to get the 638 for the single action capability but realized that in a defense situation I probably won't have time to cock the hammer for that "precise shot" that they always talk about.
DonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 21:52   #2
What? Me worry?
Senior Member
 
What? Me worry?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,740
I chose the 442 over the 642 for cosmetic reasons only. I just think the matte blue finish looked better than the stainless.
__________________
RIP - RBP
What? Me worry? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 21:58   #3
alank2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,919
Hi,

I went with the 442. It *used to be* that S&W had aggressive pricing on the 642 only and the 442 was about $100 more, but a year or two ago they dropped the 442 to the same price as the 642. I think the people who go with the 442 prefer the black look instead of the stainless. I like that the black and dark aluminum match better on the 442 than the stainless and light aluminum match on the 642. 642 has more corrosion resistance but I've never had any corrosion issues with the 442 and I don't really baby it.

Good luck,

Alan
alank2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 22:25   #4
glockess56
CLM Number 295
Charter Lifetime Member
 
glockess56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 1,331
I have a 638 and the 442. The 638 you can shoot double action, or cock the hammer (hidden hammer) if you want single action. If you want a 638, shoot it double action if you prefer. You can do it either or. I got the feeling you think you can only shoot the 638 by cocking the hammer and that's not the case. Which ever snubby you pick of these three, I don't think you will go wrong in any way.
glockess56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 10:44   #5
jdeere_man
CLM Number 26
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jdeere_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Missouri
Posts: 3,558
I think they sell more of the 642 than they do the 442. The decision of one or the other is generally based on your desires in finish.
__________________
Be weary of a summit that begins with sharing bread; for the sated man is at his weakest.
jdeere_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 15:01   #6
joestokes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
I got the 442 only because of the color. I like that the frame and cylinder matched better. If i could of bought a 642 for 100 bucks cheaper though...I would be the owner of a 642
__________________
The wolf, the sheep, and the sheepdog. The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog prepares for that day.
joestokes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 17:37   #7
jdeere_man
CLM Number 26
Charter Lifetime Member
 
jdeere_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Missouri
Posts: 3,558
They were actually the same price when I bought mine. I actually wanted the 442, even though I had heard problems of the black finish coming off, but when I got to the gun dealer we got it out and the cylinder wouldn't budge, so I took a 642 he had instead. Color doesn't really matter to me in the end though because it's always in my pocket.
__________________
Be weary of a summit that begins with sharing bread; for the sated man is at his weakest.
jdeere_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 15:33   #8
GOOFA
Senior Member
 
GOOFA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 813
If I'm not mistaken, I believe I read that the S&W 642 is the #1gun purchased by LE personnel today.
__________________
"GLOCK Certified Armorer" since 2009

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
GOOFA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 17:21   #9
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 30,766


Either one is just as good, I like the black sights.
__________________
The West is the Best.
Berto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 17:58   #10
Lazlo
Spectator
 
Lazlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 219
My next snubbie will be a 442 just because I already have a 637 and want my other one to look different.
Lazlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 09:14   #11
bluelineman
Infidel كافر
 
bluelineman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,499


Quote:
Originally Posted by What? Me worry? View Post
I chose the 442 over the 642 for cosmetic reasons only. I just think the matte blue finish looked better than the stainless.
+1

I didn't like the sights though so I put a CT LG405 laser grip on it. You get the benefit of reduced recoil (padded backstrap) + laser sight.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

"Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?" - Walid Shoebat, former PLO Terrorist
كافر Infidel لقد كان محمد شاذ جنسيا
bluelineman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 19:36   #12
fowler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,864
Yes I prefer the 642 over the weaker finish blued 442. And allso find DA only is the way to go for a defensive wheelgun. No mistake in court of a cocked hammer going off. Good combat shooters with wheelguns never use the SA mode. Learn to shoot combat DA only. With practice its easy to put 5 shots center in the head DA at 7yds with slow DA fire. Just like the greats did like Bill Jordan. Its a art that easy to learn . The 642 is atop seller for selfdefence today.

Last edited by fowler; 04-14-2008 at 19:38.. Reason: spelling
fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 20:20   #13
Lazlo
Spectator
 
Lazlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 219
Is the 442's finish really that much more susceptible to wear as opposed to the clearcoat finish on the 642, or just more noticeable?
__________________
"I think once you stop hearin' sir and ma'am the rest is soon to follow" - Ed Tom Bell
Lazlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 21:15   #14
alank2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,919
Hi,

I've got a 442 and the finish has held up wonderfully. I don't baby it either, it sees lots of unholster/reholster action. The barrel/cylinder are blued steel and the aluminum frame is some sort of painted or anodized surface, I'm not sure what.

Good luck,

Alan
alank2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 22:04   #15
G33
CLM Number 296
Re-Assigned
 
G33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: With G29
Posts: 58,683


Black is beautiful?
Drew told me so.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


"I'd wager G would waterboard a salmon."--tous

"...those without swords can still die upon them." --Eowyn
G33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:51   #16
G26S239
NRA Patron
 
G26S239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PRK
Posts: 10,586
I actually liked the 442 better. But my friend bought the one they had left at a store during a Smith & Wesson Days sale. So I bought the 642, I like it a lot. You won't go wrong with either.
G26S239 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2008, 16:43   #17
Ulysses
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,451
In the days BEFORE the clear coat finish over aluminum the 642 might have been a better choice.

If you go over to S&W Forum and search this sight you hear stories of the clear coat finish coming off with various cleaners on the 642's.

The blued (black IMHO) finish on the 442 and former 37 models looks fairly nice and seems durable based on used guns I see.

I have OLDER aluminum J-Frames pre-lock with good finish and moderate amount of use.

I am sure my guns are anodized well. I wonder WHY the clear coat finish is used today? Is it because the S&W stainless aluminum guns have a cheaper annodizing process which is less durable?
Ulysses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2008, 17:40   #18
operator81
Senior Member
 
operator81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wide Open Spaces
Posts: 625
Once you go black you never go back

I chose the 442 over the 642. I feel the look of a worn black gun is far prettier than a scratched up stainless colored one. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I had heard the cylinder and barrel on the 442's are stainless with a black finish applied over top, similar to the MP Autos. Not sure if thats correct or not.

I got the same LEO price on the 442 as the 642, but I prefer black to stainless, unless its nickel, which is just sexy on a revolver, not to mention durable to boot.
operator81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 08:17   #19
mo.glocker
Senior Member
 
mo.glocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: st.charles,mo
Posts: 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator81 View Post
I chose the 442 over the 642. I feel the look of a worn black gun is far prettier than a scratched up stainless colored one. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I had heard the cylinder and barrel on the 442's are stainless with a black finish applied over top, similar to the MP Autos. Not sure if thats correct or not.

I got the same LEO price on the 442 as the 642, but I prefer black to stainless, unless its nickel, which is just sexy on a revolver, not to mention durable to boot.
yes and the 642 is not stainless at all,its the same aluminium as the 442 ,it just has the added aggrivation of the clear powdercoat comming off!
__________________
wake up sheeple!
mo.glocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 08:19   #20
Free Radical
CLM Number 259
Miembro Antiguo
 
Free Radical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Four Corners
Posts: 18,841


Quote:
Originally Posted by GOOFA View Post
If I'm not mistaken, I believe I read that the S&W 642 is the #1gun purchased by LE personnel today.


The 642 is S&W's largest seller.
Free Radical is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:52.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,042
315 Members
727 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31