GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2002, 09:40   #1
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Model Seven caliber recommendations?

The Remmington Model 7 is available in a variety of calibers. I have been considering a .243 for deer or a 7mm-08 or 30-06 for deer and more. Or to get a Model 700 Mountain Rifle for the more powerful calibers (but I think they weigh about the same, so recoil should be similar). Anyone here have a Model 7 or shot one? I would appreciate your experiences and thoughts.

Thanks,
Arbee
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2002, 14:01   #2
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
The model 7 has a short action which means it requires cartridges such as the .243 win., 7mm-08, 308 win., 260rem. etc. The 30-06 is a longer cartridge and is too long for the model 7 to handle.

As for hunting deer with a model 7 appropriate cartridge, what type of deer are we talking about?

Small Texas whitetails? Big Wyoming, Montana, Colorado mulies? Or really big whitetails from Saskatchewan?

A .243 win. using 100 grain bullets will work for some, A 7mm-08 can handle heavier bullets in the 154-175 grain range, and .308 will work for the larger deer using 150 to 180 grain bullets. But remember, none of the calibers will work in the case of poor shot placemment.

That said, I have and use a model 7 in .308. I did replace that joke of a 18 1/2" barrel with a new 22" take-off barrel from a Rem 700 in .308 win. Now I'm happy, the rifle is very accurate and is ever-so slightly muzzel heavy which helps steady it for shooting from a standing position.

The new model 7s are available with the newer "short magnum" cartridges from Remington. I'd sure give SERIOUS consideration to a 7mm RSAUM (Remington Short-Action Ultra Magnum) or a .30 RSUM. I know if I were shopping for a new rifle, a RSAUM would be in the plans.

Good luck on your selection! Check out this link to Remington Short-Action Ultra Mags.

http://www.remington.com/firearms/ce...a_ultramag.htm
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2002, 22:45   #3
WalterGA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 4,081
As long as you're not talking about deer larger than 350# or so, the .243 will do just fine and won't knock your shoulder off while it's doing it. (Plus, you can load bullets as light as 55gr. for plinking and varmint shooting)
WalterGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 09:28   #4
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Thanks, Walter & Elkslayer. I may go with the .243 for the soft recoil. But can you guys help me understand better the difference between the .308 and 7mm-08 in the Seven --- not only in terms of relative recoil, but also for the range of game for which they would appropriate and the range/cost of factory loads available.

Which calibers would be good/best for Elk as well as deer?

Also, Elkslayer, if you think the barrel is poor, wouldn't I be better off just going for the 700 Mountain Rifle? I think the current Model Seven has a 20" barrel and the Mountain Rifle a 22".

Last edited by Arbee; 08-11-2002 at 09:48..
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 12:22   #5
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
Arbee - you are correct on the current bbl length of 20" for M7s.

I just happend to pick up a used early M7 that had been on the rack at a local gunshop for over a year. I suspect it was there exactly because of recoil and muzzle blast in such a short 18 1/2" bbl. I drove about 1/2 mile after buying it over to a gunsmith who just so happend to have a brand new 22" .308 win. bbl from a Rem. M700. He installed it and bedded the rifle for all of $75. I now have a total of $350 in the rig. (Just ordered a HS Precision stock for it). The rifle had sat on the rack for over a year and everybody joked about that short bbl not realizing how cheap and easy it would be to put another bbl on it.

I don't have any experience with a 7mm-08 but I can't imagine that one could tell the difference between a 7mm-08 and a .243.

I sometimes shoot a Rem. 6mm. It is in an old model 660. Either I have shot enough to not notice or there isn't any noticable difference between the 6mm and my .308 win in a model 7. Both are about the same in weight and size.

Now when you are talking about hunting elk,,,, you had better use a cartridge that can hammer them as most of the elk I shoot are cows and go around 400 lbs when gutted but still have head, hide and hooves on. If you shoot an bull larger than a spike you are talking more weight and usually more tenacity to live and escape.

That being said, I know and work with guys who have and do dumped elk every year with .243s but they r-e-a-l-l-y place their shots and they have a lot of elk hunting experience. They also will pass on shots which pose poor shot placement as they have several weeks to hunt and have opportunities though out the season to take elk so they don't have to shoot the first one they see. I also have personally seen elk poorly hit with .338 win mags have to be tracked down (by ME!! and sometimes it takes all day from a shot at sunrise till dusk when I find the critter) because the shooter didn't place his shot well, probably because he wasn't use to shooting a .338 mag.

I always ask them how much they shoot their rifles. When they say "Oh, I sighted it in and shot about a box of shells before coming out here", I know that person isn't "one" with his rifle.

I have and shoot a variety of rifles. Often I will hunt during the same season using a different rifles depending on where I'm hunting and what the terrain is. Will I be sneaking through timber? Is the area infested with grizzlys? Am I apt to see elk feeding on a ridge and can't put a sneak on them any closer than say 300-400 yards? Here is a list of cartridges in assending order from what I feel is "minimal" to quite adequate.

.270 win., .308 win., .280 Rem., 7mm Mag., 30-06, .300 Win. Mag., 338-06, 35 Whelen, 45-70, .375H&H.

Now I do, and have hunted elk with each one of these. I've taken elk with most of them. It just depends on where and how I will be hunting. None of them will allow for poor shot placement!! But those above and including the 30-06 level will allow for more of an angle shot (heavy, properly constructed bullets are used here) where you may have to plow through a lot of tissue to reach the vitals or a shoulder. I limit my shots to under 300 yards and mostly don't have to shoot that far anyway. The occasion where I do shoot at 300-400 yards, I'm using a range finder, a VERY solid rest, am shooting from a spot where I have been waiting for elk to pass through and have PRACTICED AND PRACTICED AND PRACTICED WITH THE RIFLE I'M USING SHOOTING AT THOSE DISTANCES!!!

Hell, I even go to our rifle range at lunch (a 1 hour lunch) to shoot. Several of us go and place bets on who can get the best groups at 300 yards. I even practice at 300yds with the 45-70s and both of mine are lever guns with iron sights. I don't use the 45-70s for ANY shot at game beyond 200 yds.

As you see, I believe in heavier calibers for elk and you just can't practice enough with your rifle. (Have I mentioned this point before??)

If I were considering one rifle to hunt with and it HAD to be a Model 7 and my hunting would include everything from coyotes to elk, I'd go with the 300 RSAUM. I'd load 120s or 130s for the song dogs and I'd load 180s for the elk. 150s would be great for the deer I'd be hunting between elk trips.

Other than that, you can get into the "got a gun for every critter I hunt" syndrome but that either takes a lot of time and/or it sure as hell takes a lot of money!
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 13:45   #6
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Elkslayer --- I have not hunted with a rifle and I will not shoot at any game animal until I have shot enough to be competent (a box of ammo won't do it). I am not going to buy a zillion rifles, because I won't have time to learn to shoot them all competently. I might end up with two or three tops. I don't have immediate plan to hunt Elk, so I am somewhat torn between a .243 for easy recoil, and less expensive ammo to learn to shoot well, and getting something like the RSAUM M7 for a do-all to start with. How's the recoil and the ammo cost on the 300RSAUM for 150s for deer?

Also, what do you guys think of synthetic vs laminated stocks?
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 14:53   #7
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
I just called a well stocked hunting / outdoors store. for 300 RSAUM ammo using PREMIMIUM bullets, it runs right at $30.00 for a box of 20. For non-premimum bullets, it runs around $22.00 per box. I haven't shot or even talked with anyone who owns one of the short action magnums so I can't even give you any 2nd hand advice. All I know is what the gun writers have said in the gun rags, which is, the advantages of using a short fat cartridge is; a) more effecient burning of less powder to attain the same velocity as what the bigger 7mm rem mag and 300 win mag do, and b)they produce noticeably less recoil when compared to their bigger brothers (7mm rem mag and 300 win mag), and they have the same effect on game as their bigger brothers cause the bullet doing X fps doesn't know if it was shot out of a RSAUM or a longer, belted mag. as long as you are using the same bullet and velocity, the results are the same.

I would suggest if you will be hunting deer most of the time before you go on an elk hunt I'd go with the .243 win. Then when you are planning your elk hunt in a few years, you can pick up a more elk appropriate cartridge which will give the market forces enough time to determine if they like the Winchester version or the Remington version of the new short action magnums. As for right now, they both are new enough that there doesn't seem to be any noticable trend as to which will win out and stay around for a while and which is just a flash in the pan.

For a stock preference, if you are fond of wood and are of the belief that wood belongs on a rifle, the laminated stock is very stable and will be effected less by moisture than say a non-laminated wood stock is and they sure are nice and pleasing to the eye. On the otherhand, if you are going to be out in inclement weather where you might get rained on or you want a tough stock which can survive getting bumped into without getting those nasty dings that wood gets, by all means go with a stainless rifle in a synthetic stock.

I like wood, but I just ordered a HS Precision synthetic stock for my model seven because the synthetic is tough and I like the sand/camo patten for use here in Wyoming.

If, as you say, you might end up with 2 to 3 rifles tops, I'd say go with the .243 for the lower end now and pick up a larger caliber later for your second rifle. That way you could do your deer hunting now and plan for your elk trip in a few years. Oops, I just repeated myself.
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!

Last edited by Elkslayer; 08-11-2002 at 14:57..
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 15:39   #8
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Elkslayer --- thanks much. Your info and advice, combined with Walter's, says start with the .243. That's very helpful. I like wood, but I am open. BTW, how do I find out more about the HS Precision stock (website?), and who carries it? I saw a photo of a M7 in an article on light mountain rifles and it had a camo desert stock, and I liked it. Seems like a fit for Texas and Oklahoma, too.
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 16:07   #9
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
HS Precision

http://www.hsprecision.com/Pages/sport1.html

I have visited their plant several times and spoken with the owners. They are very nice folks to deal with. Just plain old folks who care about customer satisfaction and work to make you happy.

They are hunters and shooters who know what people want. Their products are very well made and rank amoung the top synthetic stock manufactures as far as quality, fit, and function. They are more reasonably priced that others but their aluminum block bedding system is tops.

If you are aware of the Dakota Rifles and know the quality demanded by Don consider that he uses HS Precision stocks on his rifles when customers request a synthetic stock.

http://www.dakotaarms.com/index.html
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 16:22   #10
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Yes, I know about Dakota. Thanks again.
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 18:52   #11
cigarman
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: SC
Posts: 37
I have booth the 7mm08 and 243. The 243 was bought for my 13 year old son because of recoil. If I had purchased the 7mm08 first I would not have purchased the 243. You cannot tell the difference in recoil. The 7mm08 has higher velocity and more muzzle energy and can handle the larger bullets as mentioned.
cigarman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 19:25   #12
LAWDOGKMS
Senior Member
 
LAWDOGKMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 2,227
I have a mod 7, blued, 18" barrel, in .308.

It does kick a little off the bench, but I just use extra padding between my shoulder and the buttstock on the bench, but in the field, even with Hornady Light Magnum 150 grainers, it doesn't kick any harder than a mod 700 I have I 30'06, with the 30'06 light mags...

Believe me, a 150 grain light mag will bust a coyote's a _ _ !

The .308 is by far the most versatile cartridge the Model 7 is chambered in.

You can shoot 120-130 grainers at varmints, 150-180 grainers for deer/antelope etc... and even 200 Grain roundnose for black bear/hogs etc...

Also, forgot to add that I can shoot a sub-moa group with the 18 1/2" barrel..

Hunting, Fishing & Camping

Last edited by LAWDOGKMS; 08-11-2002 at 22:14..
LAWDOGKMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 19:39   #13
paynter2
It ain't over
 
paynter2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: upper mid-west
Posts: 8,838


Arbee - the difference between a .243 and 7mm-08. GT'ers feel free to correct me - it's been a long time...

The .308 is actually the 7.62X52 NATO calibre (7.62mm being the metric equivalent of .30 inch or .30 calibre. 52 is the case length in mm). The .243 is a 6mm bullet in a .308 case (52mm long). The 7mm-08 is, obviously, a 7mm bullet in a .308 case. You can compare ballistics at:

<http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/centerfire>

Either the .243 or 7mm-08 will dispatch deer - as will the .308 and a host of other calibres. I think I'd go with the .243 - just my own oppinion. .243 carts. are easy to find anywhere you look and can usually be had cheap at Wal-mart, etc. Good luck with your purchase.
__________________
The state of the monetary system of a people is a symptom of all its states. -- Joseph Alois Schumpeter.
paynter2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2002, 19:46   #14
bustedknee
Curmudgeon
 
bustedknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wythe County, VA
Posts: 4,279
I have one of the Model 7s with the 18 1/2 inch barrel and I love it. It handles like a dream and is very accurate.

I have no complaints about recoil or muzzle blast.

It ain't for sale.

The 308 is a great all-round cartridge. And wonderful for deer.
bustedknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2002, 16:09   #15
WFR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,093
All you Model 7 owners....
What kind of scope are you using?
I have a 7mm-08 and don't want to "over scope" the little rifle.
I'm thinking a Leupold Vari X II in 2 x 7 x 33 or a 3 x 9 compact.
I already have a Leupold one-piece base.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
__________________
"In God We trust"
WFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2002, 18:05   #16
Sharker
Senior Member
 
Sharker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,457
I wanted to get the 7-08 but was vetoed by the lady, and so I bought a 243. Tommorrow is the first shot, so I will let every one know what I think then. If you are torn between the 243 and 7-08, heres the deciding factors for me... recoil is a little less than the 7mm, but not much. Ammo is Much easier to find for 243, and you can try a larger variety to see what shoots well for your gun. and of coarse I found a REALLY GOOD DEAL on a 243. Either cartridge will kill a deer as dead as the other if you do you job and put it in the right spot. If you dont do your job then call the Army about a howitzer.
Let us know the out come.
OH for scopes, Leupold is the way to go if you have the $$$. If you hunt in the woods, gt as low a power as possible. In the open plains or anywhere that 300 yard shots present themselves, get a variable 3x9 is great. The larger the Bell, the havier the scope. It does gather more ligjht with a larger bell, but ask yourself ahead of time if thats worth the weigth in the field.
Sorry so long.
Sharker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2002, 17:56   #17
bustedknee
Curmudgeon
 
bustedknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wythe County, VA
Posts: 4,279
Mine has a Leupold 4 power on it. It was there when I bought the gun and my first thought was to replace it with a variable power. But after shooting it then hunting with it, I ain't changing a thing.
bustedknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2002, 19:10   #18
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
Mine wears a 4X Redfield compact. I really wish it was a 6X though.

I find that variables are a pain, seems they are always on the wrong setting when you throw the rifle to your shoulder. That is not a problem with a fixed power.
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2002, 16:00   #19
Arbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 2,610
Thanks everyone for contributing lots of helpful advice.

I have considered either a 4X fixed or a 1.5 - 5.0 variable. What's the useful range on the 4X? If a deer pops out 25 - 50 yards in front of me, is the 4X going to be a problem?
Arbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2002, 08:03   #20
Elkslayer
Senior Member
 
Elkslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 112
A 4X probably wouldn't be a problem. Just make sure it has good light gathering abilities. The problem I have with my 4X is the lack of light gathering ability of a 32mm objective lens.

When I used my Model 7 .308 with its 4X compact Redfield Widefield scope hunting whitetails in a creek bottom last year, the bigger bucks were coming out into the alfalfa field just about 5 minutes before it was illegal to shoot. Plenty of does and small bucks were out as much as 1 to 1 1/2 hours before it was too late but the really big whitetail bucks came out last and right at the end of shooting time. My 4X compact did not perform well for me at dusk!
__________________
Sub Club member #145 (cause all it takes is 1, .45)
NRA Life member, RMEF, '99 H-D FLHTC
And a elk huntin' fool!

Last edited by Elkslayer; 08-16-2002 at 13:52..
Elkslayer is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:53.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,139
341 Members
798 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42